The SEC is not Crypto friendly - Coinbase wells notice is proof

avatar

The U.S securities and exchange commission are definitely not crypto friendly. Don't be fooled by its so-called "protecting the investors" shit talks. This whole thing is more about getting their cuts off every dollar bill and having full control and oversight on crypto investments. Regulations from a certain point of view may seem like the all righteous angle, but this is the 21st century, no one needs all that, financial education is a broader topic world wide, so people pretty much know how to manage their finances and are well-decisive of where to invest. The SEC can lay low, or better still back off because this isn't centralized money, it's the people money, it's a movement towards "being your own bank"

Take a look at what is going on with Coinbase. Despite being a NASDAQ listed cryptocurrency exchange, it's still placed on silly watch over, receiving well notes over a project that's supposed to bring more yields for investors, it was even better off private. The expansion of the industry is the SEC's worry, these guys don't really care about regulating cryptocurrency, it's more about cracking it down. The SEC doesn't understand crypto, blockchain or decentralization, all it understands is Fiat, manipulation and centralization.


Source

Coinbase revealed Tuesday that it received a Wells notice from the SEC last Wednesday about its planned Lend program. A Wells notice is the official way a regulator tells a company it intends to sue the company in court.
In a blog post titled “The SEC has told us it wants to sue us over Lend. We don’t know why,” Coinbase explained that it has been “proactively engaging with the SEC about Lend for nearly six months” so the notice came as a surprise. The company described that the Lend product will “allow eligible customers to earn interest on select assets on Coinbase, starting with 4% APY on USD coin (USDC).”reference

The SEC asked Coinbase for various documents, which the company said it “willingly provided.” However, the regulator “also asked for the name and contact information of every single person on our Lend waitlist,” which Coinbase said it has not agreed to provide.

It's becoming increasingly strange how strongly the SEC wants to get their hands on users' personal information. The problem holding off cryptocurrency exposure in most parts of the world is basically "life threat" Most of the population know of crypto, some are invested in it, but many can't even speak of it in the public. The authorities getting their hands on those data is a threat to crypto investors, it doesn't matter whether or not you're a fraudster in the space, everyone is inclusive. It's either you end up being taxed till your pocket runs dry or get charged for refusing the taxation. More shit loads will further be brought to the table to spice up the matters, investigations will be made and lies will be font up in their favor.

It's a similar approach worldwide. I recall the #endsars protest which occurred in Nigeria, where lots of lives were lost in the process. This all began as though authorities began harassing the youth on the streets, invading their privacy by taking control of their devices and going through it. This shit had been neutralized as the attention of the world was brought to it, but now, it's slowly coming back.

Youths are now scared to move out, especially the crypto invested ones, because the first thing you'd hear is that you're a scammer, you'd get arrested in that note, and when once you're in jail, it's gonna be left to pay outrageous charges which would likely run you down on your crypto investments. The SEC going against Coinbase is no different, the request for personal data out of Coinbase announcement of its lend program is just crazy. Coinbase is experienced in knowing how to project their services. The SEC job is to regulate Coinbase investment projects, not asking for customers' IDs.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong took to Twitter to share his thoughts and clarify the situation with the SEC early Wednesday morning.
“Some really sketchy behavior coming out of the SEC recently,” he began, adding:
"Ostensibly the SEC’s goal is to protect investors and create fair markets. So who are they protecting here and where is the harm? People seem pretty happy to be earning yield on these various products, across lots of other crypto companies"

Apparently, they are harming the investors by putting a bridge to this. They ain't crypto friendly, just a body of bullies, financial bullies, the actual criminals if we're being real. This points us back to the truth that centralized powers hate to see citizens making huge gains on investments, they always wish to wheel the money back to their pockets.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
6 comments
avatar

It’s a nothing burger. Someone in Gensler’s office has a “fat” finger. Simple clarification and it goes away. Sadly, this is what happens when you become a public blockchain company. ;)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

this is what happens when you become a public blockchain company.

That's the angle the whole shit is coming from...

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yea i can be in agreement with the government not wanting this type of prosperity for all it's citizens. How a company raises money and the investors and participants i don't feel should be under anything like Regulation D of the SEC.

Here's where my opinion now may differ from yours. If Ethereum was able to go out raise millions of dollars. Then become to some degree of the SEC's interpretation decentralized. Now Gensler i believe is fairly reexamining Ethereum and saying it was actually a security. i also disagree that the sec doesn't understand crypto. They may be trying to block citizens from using crypto. However they certainly understand it at it's most sophisticated level. I've studied Gary Gensler and he's very knowledgable.

Here's my problem. If the SEC goes after one project and declares it's a unregistered security. Then i feel it's only fair everybody's head is brought to the altar. This throwing darts on the wall of who we going to go after next isn't fair to other projects. Ethereum raised $18 million they are an unregistered security by any understanding of what an unregistered security is. They should be held accountable just like everyone else was.

As far as, citizens being able to have the economic prosperity and freedom of choice as to where they wish to put their money i support that. However part of the problem is the crypto space will still use the government to prosecute fraud cases in crypto and illegal activity. You can't be both a little bit pregnant and not pregnant. You operate free outside of government control or you don't. that's all i'm saying. crypto has to figure out what it wants to be.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Very awesome comment. I've been thinking about this for so long, I mean the sudden compliance to SEC regulations law coming from certain crypto projects has been disturbing, it all takes the motive of decentralized and uncensored. Complying to these laws literally means you're inviting them to control you, so you ain't running freely anymore, it's then is no sweat if they ask for every tiny details about your company.

This is the case with Coinbase, going public was the first misstep, then inviting the SEC regulate them, so this occurrence was inevitable.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

True but then remember what the SEC howey test says. It says the expectation of profit on the work of others. The problem is that most of us are using crypto to make a profit on some creation of others. So most projects are more like this business endeavor. Even bitcoin sometimes feels a bit sketchy as a currency. In a currency you don't really expect profit. However the decentralization of bitcoin is accepted. The problem is all these projects in between. Do we really use them more like a currency in a decentralized manner? Or do they function more like assets in a business?

See that's where the sec has alot of play to make determinations about your status. Many don't understand they have many precedent cases to pull from and they often times will win. So i greatly believe in have destiny and freedom to make the best decisions for you. However the crypto community has to be prepared to take everything comes with that. We say we are. However how long before something happens and we scream regulation and wanna take people to court about our money? lol. So idk i think we got a long road ahead of us.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000