Chainlink Oracles Are Going To Leave You Rekt

avatar

The DEFI space has taken it's first big knock and I can see a few are starting realise that there is no such thing as achemy and no one has a magic money printing machine. I've seen many LUNA'tics who got rekt, starting to turn over a new leaf and become bitcoin maxi's and I guess their loss is a tution fee they paid to learn a valuable lesson.

Then you get the others who still want to double down on their mistakes, they think this is the cost of doing business, that it's part of the plan, for every one 100 that fail there will be that one moon shot that makes up for it. Everyone in DEFI thinks they're a VC investor but without the liquidity and the information assymetry when making these bets.

Surviviourship bias is a hell of a drug

I often hear the argument, yeah Luna is a shitcoin, it was bound to fail, but my shitcoin is different. Surviviourshop bias kicks in, just because your protocol hasn't failed yet doesn't mean it's immune from collpase in the near future.

The longer a shitcoin survives, the more confidence people have in it, the more confidence they have the more they allocate. The more they allocate, the more overconfident the devs become, they make mistakes, they build half arsed solutions, they discount risk and right when people are at their most bullish is when they get rugged.

Defi is risk on top of risk

The DEFI spae is made up of multiple EVM chains or EVM like chains, that can mint tokens, they usually have a native token, a stablecoin issued by a centralised provider, an algo stablecoin and a host of DEFI coins.

  • Now having your largest liquidty being a centralised stablecoin alone should be ringing alarm bells, but shitcoiners don't consider this an issue.

  • Having an algo stablecoin backed by a native token that is illiquid and under colletarlised should be a major red flag but shitcoiners discount it.

  • Having coins that are not native to your chain minted ontop of it through a rehypohthication bridge or a centralised entity should be a red flag but shitcoiners discount it.

Now these red flags are dangerous, but none so much as how these DEFI systems acquire their price feeds. This entire defi space is an incestious pool of shoddily built interconnected bridges of bullshit rehypothecation of assets.

They feed in prices to their smart contracts and automatic market markers through centralised entities, centralised data aggregators and then use that to feed to the various chains via pretty much centralised nodes.

If you want an overview of how the feeds are processed, each layer carrying its own risk you can see it below.

Chainlink house of cards

Source: - chain.link

Multiple providers means safety in numbers

Now shitcoin apologists will tell you that because the nodes are pulling in feeds from multiple providers that it's safe. If one provider's price feed is wonky, between all providers and aggregators you can find the right price.

That is true, but what isn't true is that chainlink nodes are infallible, they can be paused, their data can be corrupted, nodes can be attacked, nodes can be manipulated by those who have the keys.

In chainlinks case, it only takes 3 out of 21 keys to change a price feed, that's hardly much security if you think 3 people are responsible if that is even 3 people having 1 key each, to set the price for all these shitcoin chains and the defi protocols living on top of them.

Chainlink nodes and oracles provide a massive central point of failure that no one is talking about and when people wake up to it, it will be too late.

Don't take my word for it

What do you good people of HIVE think?

So have at it my Jessies! If you don't have something to comment, "I am a Jessie."

Let's connect

If you liked this post, sprinkle it with an upvote or esteem and if you don't already, consider following me @chekohler and subscribe to my fanbase

Earn Free bitcoin & shopEarn Free Bitcoin & shopClaim Free Bitcoin & Shop
lightning.jpgSmiles.jpgthebitcoincompany.jpg

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



17 comments
avatar

Defi is risk on top of risk

Dear @chekohler , I have understood Defi as a virtual space where cryptocurrency transactions, savings, loans and interest are created.
Do you think Defi has lost its proper functioning through centralization?

0
0
0.000
avatar

No, it was never a properly functioning market, it's taking unsound principles that are used in traditional markets slapped a token on it to avoid having to actually have backing and selling you absolute shit

0
0
0.000
avatar

These guys in the crypto discord are trying to predict link back to moon or 100$ or something. I’m glad I got out when I did lol it doesn’t sound like a good product. I made money off it at least so I was happy with that. I could have made a lot more if I held but just making money is a start!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Lol someone got to be your exit liquidity, gosh I hope they raise interest rates another 25 BPs I look forward to more pain. Death to the shitcoins

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think you said what I thought but couldn't articulate. To be honest, on the level of mental perception, I eschew bridges and pools, then. which is difficult, quite dangerous, in my opinion. The more complex the car, the more you spend on spare parts and electronics is the weakest link in the chain and auto electrician practically, starts to be perceived as a member of the family, lol.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Lol I think I like the way you said it better, the analogy is spot on, these people think that adding more wheels to your car makes it better, there's a reason a car only needs 4 wheels

0
0
0.000
avatar

People like to prove Fermat's theorem, it takes a lot of time, it's more like pride than not a vital necessity, I don't remember what it would be useful to me in life, for me it is the fifth leg of a horse, but, many people will not share my opinion). I think that the functionality of coins should be no more complicated than a table knife and fork.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I agree, the layers of complexity is just there to keep you from asking questions and to try and make you think you're too dumb to understand the scam.

0
0
0.000
avatar

If you find yourself in the food markets of Moldova, or Romania, you are more likely to be surrounded by a lot of gypsies who want to tell you everything, your past, present and future. but, with only one, the only purpose, so that you divert your attention from the main thing, from your wallet)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I was looking at this too. Im for sure bullish on Chainlink and thinking to go big before it moons!

0
0
0.000
avatar

LOL did you even read my post? Chainlink labs has been dumping on you noobs for ages now lol

0
0
0.000
avatar

i read it and all the big corporate names are in on it. It will be a part of the crypto infrastructure in the future. I'm getting in early and hodling.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Lol, then you clearly didn't read it, because I explain how it's fundamentally flawed and you DON"T need a token to run an oracle, it's an unnecessary layer of bullshit.

0
0
0.000
avatar

whether we need it or not is irrelevant. this is what the controllers want to implement. so I'm just making a calculated bet that it will be. when it 100x, I will let you know on hive!

0
0
0.000