Covid-19 is more than 3 times deadlier than common flu, says WHO: “Gl ...

avatar

Covid-19 is more than 3 times deadlier than common flu, says WHO:

“Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1% of those infected.”

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-rate/

Posted via D.Buzz



0
0
0.000
26 comments
avatar

The major of deaths or people 80 years or older.

People in their 20s - 30s have a 0.03% chance of dying from it, and that's the narrative.

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

That is not what the scientific studies that I read says:

https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ummm, that "scientific study" doesn't break it down based on age.

Almost all of the deaths are in the 80 years old+ bracket, and accounts for most of the deaths

Look for a scientific study that breaks it down by age, and you'll see the risk for people in their 20's/30's

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

Regardless of age, considering only the number of deaths, it is 3 times deadlier than common flu, by far.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Whatever you say, but it does not justify destroying small and medium businesses worldwide, and handing it on a silver platter to #BigTech, #BigBusiness and in some cases, Governments.

  • If the risk of dying from #Covid19 is 0.03% for ages 20 - 30

They should be free to go out.

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

All I am saying is that this disease is desperately deadly, and I advice people to do social distancing and stay home as much as they can to save lives. At no moment I said that all governments around the world are well intentioned.

But the majority is, that is for sure. And we are in the middle of a war that have already killed millions. And in the middle of wars you have to close businesses too.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ummm, the war I am seeing is not mankind against a virus, but Governments against their citizens . .

( some of which who do their Government's bidding, not realizing it's against society at large )

  • Again, if the death rate of #Covid19 for ages 20/30's is 0.03%.

    Posted via D.Buzz
0
0
0.000
avatar

The war I see has already 2 million deaths around the world.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Deaths that were calcuated by anyone who died within 28 days of testing positive on a Covid-19 test.

If you don't believe me, check UK's official methodology for determining Covid deaths.

You yourself said it was stupid, but don't know its what they actually use.

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't care the real cause of the deaths, only the amount of them. If they are dying from unknown csuses other than covid, worse yet. The fact is that people are dying by the millions and until proven otherwise the main cause is covid.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ummm, it is proven otherwise.

  • Compare the amount of deaths worldwide from 2018

With the deaths in 2020, its the same, or as for the #Philippines, LESS people died here.

  • If most #Covid deaths were NOT Covid deaths.. why would you still be cheering global house arrests?

    Posted via D.Buzz
0
0
0.000
avatar

If your rationale says to you it is proven otherwise, good luck to you with it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ummm . .

  1. If the same amount of people died in 2020 as 2018 than how is it as a deadly as You say?

  2. If the death rate for people under 70 years old is 0.1%, why are You and others afraid?

    Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

Because the specialists are saying. If you prefer to believe in the statistics of conspiracists without a perr review, good luck.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's not "the specialists" who are saying it.

  • It is specialists endorsed by the US Government, Mainstream Media, Big Tech and the Universities you refer to.

It's obvious you haven't checked the actual data or specialists outside of that group.

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't trust opinion of individual specialists, but studies done by a group of specialists and ready to be peer reviewed. Otherwise, it is only somebodys speculation, not science.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You would be better of starting a war against car accidents using your methodology:



Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Car accidents are not contagious and they do not kill those who do not want to take the risk.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You are waaaay there IMO and IMO car accidents are a perfect example.

  1. It kills a lot of people (more than #Covid)
  2. It would be silly to lock down the entire world to prevent it.

If you watch the video, it's a comedy, and it explains how silly it is to lockdown.

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

Car accidents only kills those who know they are accepting the visible risks, and btw there are social rules and laws created to minimize them. More so, driving serves a social economic purpose.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Okay, so stay locked up in your house wrapped in face masks, face shields, whatever you need..

And then let everyone else who's not scared to death of death (willing to take the risk), live their life without Government intervention.

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

No, if you live in society you need to obey rules. That's why there are rules to drive a car.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Umm, just rules should be followed, unjust rules should not.

Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Agree. Rules must benefit more than harm. That is why that makes a lot of sense to have rules to drive a car for instance.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The rules surrounding Covid-19 cause more harm than benefits IMO.


Posted via D.Buzz

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think the majority of the scientists disagree with you. But there will always be the conspiracists.

0
0
0.000