RE: Hive Governance, Decentralization, and Campaign for Leofinance Witness
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
😁
Clearly there's more nuance to the situation
@freedom if you're reading
I don't know anything about you as a person, I'm sure you're lovely and I didn't mean to say you personally are a dictator.
My proper meaning is the hive account. The owner of that account could decide who is and isn't in the top 20, that much is implied. Whoever is the owner of @freedom, they have that level of power in the network, even if they choose not to use it or only use it in benevolent ways.
But, if that power has been gained through the legitimate means, then there's no real problem there
See, I don't know
I'm just commenting as an ousider
But if true, it points to a wider problem in that the system allows an account with that much (too much?) power over the network, which would be a design flaw that could be remedied
P.S. I don't know how this ended up on the poshbot comment, I was trying to just reply to your post oops
I doubt freedom reads posts or comments. All stakes on Hive are legit. What I mentioned was something of the past. We are more decentralized now. Even if freedom chose to vote, those votes can be countered in decentralized fashion.
I see
Thank you
Every day's a school day 😁