RE: LeoFinance Engagement | I Just Sent Out 1400 LEO to Everyone Who Beat Me Last Week

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

New content doesn't bring in organic traffic, which is why content that has already been ranked would continue to sit on top of things until other content was ranked properly. That would probably take anything between 3-6 months.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar

This could be solved by the last question I posed to you in my comment above. Let me know what you think.

A secondary idea would be to have some sort of “depreciation” of “content ranking” that we give a piece.

It seems that if this became a problem, we’d need some sort of ranking algorithm that accounted for it.

Otherwise, if it’s fixed in 3 months anyways because 100 more authors start creating optimized content, maybe its a moot point

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Haven't thought about this, but the first thing that comes to mind is having a limit of the prizes.

Like: X amount of LEO is the absolute most you can generate for one article. That way, people will have to produce more optimized content as well, to be able to earn this sweet and juicy passive LEO rewards.

Judging by your previous comment, it sounds like you'd be fine with rewarding the same authors thousands of LEO if that content is generating the most traffic, so what about having a limit of say 2K LEO or something per article.

I feel that it would bring more competition as well, because even if you have the most awesome content you've ever seen and it brings in billions of visitors, you'd still need to come up with more optimized content to continue to earn those extra LEO once you've reached your limit so to speak.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000