RE: Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
It seems like they're debating more than anything. I find that people are quite passionate about governance on POB.
0
0
0.000
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
It seems like they're debating more than anything. I find that people are quite passionate about governance on POB.
Yeah it seems like it, arguing for an idea to make the POB platform better is a good thing. As long as they don't argue that could ruin the friendship. And we all here have different opinions, so with a debate like this an idea will be born that can make the pob platform better.
I think not need to do downvote if anyone gets 300 pob on their post, but they just need to stake a portion of the pob. For example, if their post is 300 pob and when they claim it will be 150 pob. So they have to do staking 50 pob. lol
Personally, I think those two are beyond the point where they'll stop having conversations. I feel like they're professionals, to a degree. I've seen onealfa curb his position, as well as, calumam.
It's the nature of the system. You've got different people, across planetary regions and timezones, trying to communicate. Both literally have vested interests in the ecosystem and both have gained their experience via different methodologies. If drama didn't come out of their conversations, I would be surprised...and impressed too if I'm going to be honest.
I believe in @calumam. I also believe in onealfa and everyone else who chimes in with their honest opinion. Christ if it wasn't for cal's interactions I never would have invested in POB. If either of them didn't call out certain questionable behaviors we would have collapsed long ago. The drama is good because it is visible and above the surface. I would worry, if the drama became quiet and discussed in hushed tones.
The end result of that would be fatal.