The evolution of Liquidity provision right before our eyes.

avatar
(Edited)

The future of Defi coming, but will we recognize it?

7EB44B7AF12C4D7AA90DF8E9BEEB2060.jpeg

Transaction fees, Yield Farming, AMM, PMM and Atomic Swaps, the future of crypto gets closer and closer, but it may not be the future we think is coming. If your new to decentralized finance you can read my introduction to DeFi article Here and then come back.

AMM or Automated Market Maker and Liquidity Provision…transaction fees

Being a Liquidity provider means investing your capitol, as in depositing dollar equivalent amounts of a trading pair, and agreeing to buy and sell both assets to traders on the exchange. You do this to earn transaction fees.

It started out as the straight forward adoption of the role of market maker, you pick an asset pair you think will be in demand to trade. Or you create a need to trade and then create a liquidity pair to fulfill this newly created need to trade. Then step back and let the transaction fees roll in…

Or so we thought. Funny thing this Market Maker stuff, it involves risk of the loss of your capitol from Impermanent Loss or market downturns or both. While many articles and YouTube videos have been produced and bright people debate whether it’s a bug or a feature. All I know is that I have lost money due to it and I am not alone. As previously stated, depending on the market you can lose money or make money, or both.

Yield Farming

While straight AMM Liquidity Provision is popular, the risk of loss of capitol, or actual loss of capitol must be exceeded by transaction fees to be profitable to investors. And for multiple trading pairs it wasn’t and so Liquidity providing evolved.

Yield farms were developed, I think of them as an evolutionary step. The investor or liquidity provider does the same first step: providing dollar equivalent pairs on decentralized exchanges. But instead of transaction fees in the exchange blockchain token like Ethereum or BNB? You earn Yield Farm specific tokens. So on PanCakeSwap, based on Binance Smartchain blockchain, you don’t earn the blockchain token BNB, you earn the project token Cake. This is different from the AMM decentralized exchange like Uniswap on the Ethereum blockchain, where you earn Ether.

This change was an improvement over a straight AMM in terms of increased yield, but it’s profitability is dependent on high project token prices. And project tokens on yield farms usually start out high and fall lower. There were various reasons selected to blame for falling token value and subsequent modifications in Yield Farming are meant to reduce losses and improve gains.

Cross Project Yield Farming

This change is a feature of older yield farms like Autofarm. The Yield Farm project places it’s project token in a liquidity pair on another project, earning both the other project token and the second project token. This is a creative way to increase yield to your project investors by giving them two yield sources for the same pair. It also can reduce selling pressure on the second project token and increase its price. These two changes increase earnings for investors providing capitol to trading pairs. There is still potential capitol loss from impermanent loss and token price decline, but these new modifications increase earnings enough and often cause token price appreciation, so losses are reduced and investor profits increase.

PMM Proactive Market Maker

As you recall I described AMM or Automated Market Maker as the software code underlying Uniswap, the first? Automated Market Maker Decentralized Exchange, which launched the liquidity provider DeFi revolution. This started as transaction fees only, then single project Yield Farming and led to cross project/dual project yield farming, and now we have an evolution of AMM called PMM or Proactive Market Maker. This new AMM algorithm was created to eliminate Impermanent Loss. It is new, so I can not verify that it works, but this would be a welcome change. It would be truly remarkable and an evolutionary jump in AMM DEX exchanges development.

Lastly and still in development is atomic swaps and Thorchain AMM

Thorchain is building a DEX or decentralized exchange, which is described as a modified AMM which reduces net losses to liquidity providers by charging traders additional fees, which are paid to liquidity providers. This is more of an additional compensatory mechanism then an evolutionary one, but it still represents change away from the old code to the new code, so I think it can still be considered evolutionary. The last part about Thorchain, which is still in the works, are called Atomic Swaps where you trade directly from your wallet, instead of transferring tokens to a centralized exchange wallet like Binance or Coinbase. This was a radical and important change when we used primarily CEXs or centralized exchanges for trading,but it is less important now that we have Dexs or decentralized exchanges and use Metamask to carry our cryptocurrency and control them at all times with our private keys. So Atomic swaps are less revolutionary and are a useful innovation for a prior period in time.

This last item is an important example of how the future may not be what we expect. We expected Atomic Swaps to free us from the need to surrender our cryptocurrency to centralized exchanges to trade cryptocurrency and make profits. But now we don’t just make money buying and selling, we make money with DeFi and we don’t deposit our crypto on exchanges for DeFi we connect our wallets to DeFi project websites. So by using cold wallets and web wallets like Metamask, we already have greater control over our tokens without Atomic wallets. The future we once envisioned is here, and it looks different from what we thought it would look like, and I think that’s a good thing.

Do you understand the evolution of DeFi?
What do you think of impermanent loss?
Do you have questions?

@shortsegments

A483ED5AA8C4444F81DA6059609CE2AA.jpeg

Shortsegments is a writer focused on cryptocurrency, the blockchain, non-fungible digital tokens or NFTs, and decentralized finance.

Read more of shortsegments articles here: https://leofinance.io/@shortsegments

Related Articles

By @edicted
https://leofinance.io/@edicted/impermanent-loss-the-one-topic-every-crypto-website-somehow-explains-incorrectly

By @lbi-token

https://leofinance.io/@lbi-token/no-more-impermanent-loss

Leofinance, where you can blog or share financial topic content to earn cryptocurrency, as part of a passionate social media community.

0D180F09-BBA3-41B7-A738-2C92547A8292.gif

GIF created by @mariosfame

Learn more about Leofinance with my Seven Minute Quick overview and QuickStart Earning Guide. Then you can Join for FREE! Signup takes 20 Seconds!

Click Here

4B33E9DDE3F24A3684E4183B875BBA2E.jpeg

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
15 comments
avatar

Can you explain the Atomic Swaps a bit more? I am a bit confused but I know the team wants to implement CUB on that to stop impermanent loss. Does it just increase the fees so the users are forced to pay more?

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Atomic swaps allow you to trade tokens without exchanges by peer to peer trades via smart contracts interacting with two peoples wallets simultaneously.

This means normally to trade for example Bitcoin for Eth you send your Bitcoin from your Bitcoin wallet to the Binance exchange and essentially to their Bitcoin wallet, controlled by their keys. There your Bitcoin is traded via an order book for some Ether that someone else sent from their ether wallet to the Binance exchange and the Binance exchange ether wallet. Your crypto has left your wallet, which is secured by your private key, and now resides in the Binance wallet, secured by their keys. If they halt trading on Bitcoin or ether you can’t do anything until they give you permission to move your tokens.

Atomic swaps allow the tokens to remain in your wallets, and under your control via your private keys up until the time the trade actually happens. Then the tokens move from your Bitcoin wallet to their Bitcoin wallet, and from their ether wallet to your ether wallet simultaneously. 100% secure.

Atomic swaps require only that the two parties each process wallets for the tokens they wish to trade.

Thorchain originally was going to be a true decentralized exchange. But it has taken 3-4 years to develop their atomic swap capability and their other use cases. However the world has changed drastically. Three years ago there was no Uniswap, no AMM DEX, no MakerDao and definitely no Yield Farms.

You are right that Thorchain has also developed a AMM exchange whose code is different from Uniswap. I haven’t read about it for a few months, but I believe you are correct that they pay liquidity providers with transaction fees similar to uniswap, but also an additional fee is charged to large volume trades, and this additional fee is paid to liquidity providers to offset the losses they experience from impermanent loss. At the time it was proposed a few months ago it was clear that it provided negative incentive to whales. It was unclear if the exchange would be popular.

I am less certain about how Atomic swaps work in DeFi, and I need to read more. MetaMask has developed so much and DeFi has developed so much that it is unclear how revolutionary these projects like Thorchain are now, because they were built to solve problems which existed years ago, and those problems have been solved by other developments. Decentralized exchanges and especially AMM dexs have eliminated much of the need for central exchanges in a theoretical and practical sense, but people love their centralized exchanges because they are easy to use. And occasionally offer interesting tools.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is a nice overview of this topic. You really captured many concepts in few words. Really a short segment. :)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

hmmm...autofarm DEFI ...one can earn two coins from the same pair... I did't actually get it properly. Which is the second token one is taking about. A example would have made understanding this easier.

On IML, impermanent loss, I guess transaction fess will cusion one from losing capital ...so it won;t be that bad, after all in crypto you make mad gains with IML you provably make less mad gains.

I really need to delve into all this a bit more...

However, you should talk about something very fasinating in DEFI...I don't understand it that's why a article on it maybe a good idea.

People give their crypto for lending non-custodial obvious and earn interest - that's straight forward. But what happens is they borrow on this collateral and provide that for lending and somehow in a twisty way make money.

Can you elucidate how people make mad money like this?

Good day.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Sure, for example the Kingdom Den Cake, you earn Cub from Cubfinance, and you earn Cake from PanCakeSwap.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes,

On IML, impermanent loss, I guess transaction fess will cusion one from losing capital ...so it won;t be that bad, after all in crypto you make mad gains with IML you provably make less mad gains.

Transaction fees or yield farm earnings must outpace or exceed any capitol loss due the impermanent loss.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

But what happens is they borrow on this collateral and provide that for lending and somehow in a twisty way make money.

If you borrow against your deposited capitol, you now have new capitol, which can be reinvested to earn income. As long as the rate of return on the new investment exceeds the cost of borrowing new capitol, the investor makes a profit.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000