Sometimes you have to remove the bad roots in order to make your organ ...
(Edited)
Sometimes you have to remove the bad roots in order to make your organization healthy again, but what if it's not just the roots and it's the top? Will you protect the top or remove that also when needed? Let's discuss 🤓.
Posted via D.Buzz
0
0
0.000
If it's bad roots & top, I think both need 2go. If only top goes, it can grow back w/proper nourishment from root system. If roots are bad, it remove bad roots; good roots can stay.
Then again, mayB top & roots can stay but soil needs 2B replaced.
Ah, interesting... That could very well also be an option.
Thanks for the input 😊.
!ENGAGE 10
You're welcome :)
I'm glad you understood the comment; I wanted to be sure it could fit in the D.Buzz screen.
interesting food for thought! It could very well apply to heads of states or government officials. for sure, some change for the better is needed! #dbuzzrewards
Posted via D.Buzz
Thank you... 😁
And so true, could also be applied for heads of states yes. Change doesn't always have to be a bad thing yes and is sometimes crucial in order to survive.
!ENGAGE 10
Removing both the root and top may cause more harm than good to the entire organization. So I'll rather say the root should be first filtered before doing the same for the shoot/top. But at times, the top needs to be first filtered when it comes to issue of corruption as this will be a lesson to the developing root. In my own opinion i think either way to can work if appropriately coordinated.
I also don't think you should remove all. I do believe in courses, human resource development, etc., so I would give that a chance also.
And indeed, when it comes to corruption, fraud, stealing, etc. you should remove those rotten parts.
That's true friend. Though i also do think it's better to serve them warning before removing them. Employing new people to fill up those key positions might require some expertise which might be time consuming. Nice questions @tanjakolader 😊👍
Yes, from an HR-perspective one or two or even three warnings and chances should be given out. But when it comes to illegal activities, warnings aren't an option anymore 🙈.
😀 @tanjakolader, the way its seems, you're likely a strict person when it comes to dealing with your employees. That's good anyway because it's good for people to know you by your standard or principles. I appreciate the fact that you're been real in your expression, though i suggest there should room for their adjustment.
Hahaha well, I was never in the position to "fire" people, so maybe if I were I would've talked differently. But that's my point of view.
I really do believe in giving people chances. Heck, I go beyond when it comes to helping out colleagues, but I've also seen that some don't want to be helped and only want the paycheck for doing nothing or for not realizing targets. If you can't realize the targets for whatever reason communicate it, so we can look where we could help out. Some don't even ask for help and then I have nothing to report to my superior, other then that I've asked for the status and given x amounts of reminders and no reply from the employee. And I guess that I'm strict, because I'm also very strict on myself 😅 and expect the same from colleagues.
yeah, that's how it supposed to be. There should be template for everything especially when dealing with official matters and besides,there should be discipline to accompany it because that makes the difference. Nice conversing with you👍 @tanjakolader
Hahaha it was indeed a nice and healthy discussion 👍.
I like that👍