Cryptocurrency: The Lesson From The DotCom Era

Are we in a bubble or are we not? The answer does not matter for the sake of this article. We will pass on focusing upon market conditions, instead delving into the undercurrent that is taking place.

Here is where we see the lessons that can be applied to what we are embarking upon today. At the foundation, much of this does not change. While technology is racing ahead, there are some clues for us to follow.

Many are likely to get caught in the same trap as 20+ years ago. A lot of people dove into the hype of Yahoo at $475 per share. Of course, in hindsight, that was tremendously overvalued.

So while the numbers might change, a lot of the same premise holds true.

image.png
Source

Throwing Money At Everything

For those too young to remember, the DotCom Era was something very interesting. It was rather unique in the sense that we never saw anything like that take place. Things were so new that even the "experts" were tossing money around without a clue.

It was the first, wide spread technological age. Never before had so much technologically become public. Instead of being some research piece at an upper level institution, we saw the unfolding of a new technological paradigm being discussed on national television. Everywhere we turned, there was talk about the "Information Superhighway".

Money was plentiful. Anyone with an idea that was presented as "being on the Internet" was funded. College dropouts were handed millions of dollars simply by claiming they were building an application. We can see now how insane that was. Nevertheless, people knew no better.

Of course, there were some highly successful ventures from that time. Names like Priceline, Google, and Amazon were all part of the wave that set off during that period. Money invested in them turned out to be life changing.

Even Yahoo was a successful company. It did maintain leads for a number of years in email, search, and instant messenger. Nevertheless, it was eventually sold for a smidgeon of the price as compared to its peak.

The challenge was to separate from the fact from fiction. Many of the projects were established with no intention of being completed (sound familiar?). Then we had others, like WebVan, which were legitimate in their intentions yet failed to have proper path to success. Perhaps that idea was simply ahead of its time. Today, 20 years later, grocery chains are looking to implement delivery services.

Nevertheless, it failed along with many others. Here is where the lessons of that era need to be applied.

Cryptocurrency Repeating History

Basically we can put the projects of the DotCom Era into 4 categories:

  • Big Time Success (Google, Amazon)
  • No Intention of Doing What Presented
  • Genuine But Lacking (Timing, Expertise, Money)
  • Will Survive Yet Over Inflated (Yahoo)

Naturally, everyone is looking for the first category. What is the cryptocurrency version of Amazon and Google? Where is a project that we can get into for a minimal money and watch it 100x over the course of a couple decades? Actually, in cryptocurrency we want the 100x by next Friday.

The second category is obviously one to avoid at all costs. This was most of the ICO craze. White Papers were tossed out there with no intention of completing what was set forth. It was an early version of a rug pull without the name.

When we look at the third category, we find many genuine projects. However, this is where investigation is required. The idea is sound yet it will not be pulled off. It is difficult to create a successful business from scratch, no matter what the field. Even in the digital world, a lot is required to keep things moving forward. Is the expertise along with resources there to fulfill what is expect?

Finally, the last category is the toughest to determine since it can truly only be concluded years into the future. Many thought Yahoo would keep developing and advancing. To a degree, they did yet were overwhelmed by Google. At every turn, that company was able to usurp them. So while Yahoo was a success, it was a fraction of the company Google became.

If we run through our mental checklist of projects, we can see where a few quickly fall into a particular category. As mentioned, the ICO craze gave us a lot of people who got money yet never intended on building anything. At the same time, we see many projects that sputter along because the team lacks the ability/resources to get much done.

With the rest, we have to decide which of the remaining categories will they fall into.

Development One Of The Major Keys

One of the reasons why development is consistently presented as being vital is because it is a lesson from the DotCom Era. Those entities that kept rolling out new applications and updating their existing system were the major winners. Those that ended up in the fourth category were a step or two behind in this area.

We can point to a lot of cryptocurrency projects that are "successes". Since we are dealing with blockchain, it is likely many of these keep going for years. There is no reason to stop the block production. As long as there is someone running a node, the chain will keep going.

That does not mean it will grow. In fact, many of the projects we see might have peaked already in terms of their utility. Without the continued development, it is not likely that attention will be drawn. Things get stale very quickly in the digital world. Users need to continually be engaged with new features and applications. If not, they will find it elsewhere.

The best example we see is MySpace. Here was the dominant player in the Social Media world at the turn of the century. Nothing was even close to this. It had first mover advantage along with a growing user base. It also had very little competition.

Fast forward to the present and MySpace still exists. The site is in operation and does have millions of users. Yet it is a fraction of the 100 million it reached at the peak. In other words, this is similar to Yahoo.

All of this is what we need to keep in mind when looking at cryptocurrency projects. The lessons from the DotCom Era are sound. We need to ensure that we are participating in the proper projects and not going all in on those that are going to fail.

Perhaps this might help some to frame DOGE and Shibu in a different manner.


If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and rehive.

gif by @doze

screen_vision2025_1.png

logo by @st8z

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
43 comments
avatar

pixresteemer_incognito_angel_mini.png
Bang, I did it again... I just rehived your post!
Week 79 of my contest just started...you can now check the winners of the previous week!
10

0
0
0.000
avatar

There are different customs in camping, but in the end, the language of dialogue and communication remains the best thing.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The lesson from Shib and Doge is useful
No matter to throw some bucks and invest in these projects also
I mean to make your portfolio have all types of coins

0
0
0.000
avatar

agree so im keeping an eye out for meme coin I won't invest much just some buck

0
0
0.000
avatar

Nothing wrong with having a few lottery tickets. You never know, you could hold something that moons.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is actually one of my unofficial guiding principles.

I don't invest significant resources frivolously but I'll nickel, dime, and occasionally, dollar things I don't particularly believe will offer anything of significance but seems to have the kind of appeal that would garner enough interest for a brief moon, simply because it's another way I get to "flex financial muscle" I've never had before.

At any time in my life I could've thrown $1-$100 into something if it had been an option, but since lotto tickets are the only thing one could play with back then it was foolish to participate.

Now the "lotto" is just as legit as anything else out there, so there's no reason not to buy a million FUDCOIN, or whatever, for $1. It could moon just because it has a funny meme name. Plus, as someone pointed out in another post somewhere... it's nice to own a million of something. Since most of us have never had a million of anything.

Obviously, one should do research but one of the most understated, and in my opinion, undervalued aspects of this whole space is the ability to bet on a long shot, that's less risky than the term traditionally implies.

I mean seriously, why not gamble once in a while when a few nickels might open the door to financial prosperity that was considered outrageous fantasy only a decade ago?

Prime example: dCrops.

I bought 100 alpha packs for $200 just after the presale ended and got 10 bonus packs. Last week when I checked they were trading between $6 & $8.

Granted, with the recent success of Splinterlands, and the similarities between the two, this didn't seem like a long shot, or even a gamble, to me, but my point is that wouldn't have been possible for me just a few years ago.

In order to increase my holdings that significantly my only option would've been to buy lotto tickets and hope for the best.

Now, even having no formal financial education or experience, I'm in the same position as any wizard on Wall Street. I have options. I have resources, even if it's just the occasional spare dime leftover from a liquidity pool pairing, and I have the capability to research serious investments and junk alike. It only makes sense to use these resources to the fullest, and Doge, Shiba, and all the other stuff out there that’s mooning with no real explanation is solid evidence to support that claim, I think.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well, I participated in 2017 crash and I learned few things, mainly "try not to buy on the peak"

That said, it turns out human greed is so powerful that today 2017 peak looks like a little bump on the chart.
So even if the price falls, there is good chance it will recover at least to similar levels which should be fine.

Blockchain is not going anywhere it seems.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You are right humans tend to keep repeating the same behavior.

We will keep engaging in greed until we wake up to the fact that abundance is being generated.

Sadly, it will be many decades and a few generations before that happens.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Its point blanket and absolutely clear, we would have diverse crypto projects that will gain so much, adoption wise and money wise too, but then they'll have a particular cycle where they'll get to she then they've reached the decline stage, I guess this is where i'll categorise shiba inu for example.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I still will probably never buy Doge. I did buy $75 worth of Shiba the other day just for fun. I think this is a really great way to look at things though. I think in that third category you have to add companies that have the development team, but they just take too long to get anything done so they end up fading into obscurity. There are a number of PTE games over on WAX that keep promising the world and they have the skills to do it, but they just take much to long to ever follow through. When they finally release the project it may not matter how cool it is if no one is still around.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Never a bad idea to "gamble" a little bit within reason. Perhaps Shiba is the next real deal. I have no idea.

However, I do recall the frenzy of the DotCom boom and how people were talking in millions.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

That is just crazy! I know there are people around here that deal in those numbers too.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah. There were many who became millionaires off the DotCom bubble. I believe many will get there with cryptocurrency.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, of course, but who knew that Yahoo would reach like this or, for example, Nokia
It is largely up to the development team, as your capital and investment depend on them


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Nokia is another good example although that was highly successful and completely misread the market. The same is true for Blockbuster.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

communication is the key in every crypto and community cause if there is no community then it's just useless and have no future but some meme coins can be profitable but that also depends on luck

0
0
0.000
avatar

Many project fail because they lack good communication and choices. Good one

0
0
0.000
avatar

I can clearly see Ethereum falling into the path of Yahoo. Sooner than later it's gonna have to shake hands with its killers.

Posted using LeoFinance Mobile

0
0
0.000
avatar

I will disagree with that. My view is Ethereum is in the hands of the bankers eventually. They will control the chain since the fees do not bother them.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Bitcoin has shown that it doesn't matter if something is superseeded technically. Its about market cap, liquidity and time in the market. It has staying power and yes big money will be the ones who benefit the most but they mights sort it out eventually.

0
0
0.000
avatar

We can be hopeful for it to be sorted out.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think NFTs are in a bubble - some real rubbish is being sold as NFT 'art' and at some point people will wake up and think, did I really pay money for that?

But bitcoin isn't in a bubble, it's rise is a natural response to inflation.

0
0
0.000
avatar

And what happens when inflation falls?

Does Bitcoin crash then?

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well bitcoin did crash in 2018/19 and that period was characterised by a low oil price and low inflation. So inflation definitely influences the bitcoin price.

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is why I tend to choose crypto I believe in for investment. Of course you can throw a dart at the wall but I don't think it's good to bet on something you haven't researched and believed. Solid roadmaps and their track record is the best thing to believe in.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

That is true. We are going to see a lot of winners in regards to big movers. I believe Hive is going to be one of the best performers.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

The .com bubble happened because the internet happened, it Changed the world completely. Now we have value transfer the .com bubble will look like nothing. Crypto is internet x100 so the .com/crypto bubble will be x1000

0
0
0.000
avatar

The more insidious question to ask: Is fiat in a bubble? Although there are some parallels to the dot com bubble many differences remain specifically vendor/unsecured fiat credit. I have yet to see unsecured credit offered at my bank to purchase crypto. Credit is always the main driver of bubbles. Although I think we may be at the point of legacy crypto credit offerings. Once this occurs we can revisit the bubble discussion. By then bitcoin might be approaching $200,000. :)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

The quick gains drives crypto investments. Even with projects that actually have developments in place and a team well capable, the participants are still pretty much short-term driven. Imagine where a potential project moons outrageously at launch, it will quickly crash regardless of those up coming developments.

So then, the market will have to do its thing by wiping off buyers of pumps and dumper of peaks, only then, will all this matter...

Posted using LeoFinance Mobile

0
0
0.000
avatar

The quick gains drives crypto investments.

There is an entire VC industry that operates off long term gains so I do not think the majority who are funding major technological innovations are the quick artists.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think my Ridiculous Dot Com Bubble Comparison post still stands. We can't compare crypto to Dot Com. On macro timelines crypto is going to make completely unexpected unpredictable moves. To an extent this is what Dot Com did as well.

I chuckle whenever I see billionaires like Mark Cuban making these comparisons, because they think they can declare the winners in advance (BTC/ETH/ETC) whereas during the Dot Com phase they all got wrecked. They will all get wrecked again with that kind of thinking. Or perhaps not because this space isn't competitive and it kind of feels like everything is winning in the long run.

At the end of the day it's pretty easy to pick the winners in crypto. Support the networks with diehard communities that aren't going to cut and run; that actually work and aren't getting speculation on the promise of future development.

BTC and ETH are still viable for retail investors (for now). Hive is the ultimate moonbag at such a low valuation after so thoroughly proving itself during the hostile takeover. I bet even Doge and XRP are going to make it (surprisingly). The difference between a lot of these choices won't be a battle of success vs failure, but rather of being rich vs being super rich. (lots of #1s and #4s)

Your post is great advice, and it is not my intention to undermine it. But at the same time anyone who employs any kind of financial responsibility here could never get wrecked like they would have in Dot Com. Dot Com did not dethrone the entire financial system; it was a centralized extension of it. The amount of value pouring into crypto is exponentially higher than Dot Com, with exponentially lower timeframes.

dot com bubble.gif

Judging by this we only have to worry about a Dot Com level bust if we get trapped inside a multi-year supercycle. That means the next bubble would have to be exponentially bigger than 2013/2017 combined. In which case we are all what? Billionaires before the bust?

Gross: TLDR

I'd delete this comment if I didn't spend so much time on it.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

But at the same time anyone who employs any kind of financial responsibility here could never get wrecked like they would have in Dot Com.

They didnt exhibit any responsibility in the DotCom and many got wrecked in the ICO by buying a great deal of stuff that went to zero.

So do not underestimate the ability for people to do extremely stupid things.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I mean I already saw this happen today.

Invested everything into XYZ
Lost it all in a rugpull

But something like crypto is totally different.
Imagine if back in the Dot Com era one could have just invested in the first Dot Com business for the automatic win.
Oh look the second Dot Com business is an auto win as well!

Dot Com companies were totally random, disconnected, and competitive.
Crypto is the opposite.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The information is really interesting, and with good reason, some points already known, others clarified, on the internet we sit down to wait or we advance along with technology, which by the way goes very fast

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

For crypto some people are after short term agains.

I really don't know anything about DotCom Era

0
0
0.000
avatar

An epic display of knowledge I would say. Too highly and accurate. Learning surely has no end. The points you have mentioned are very accurate, at least to the limited knowledge I have. I was thinking about this delving of crypto, at first, this chain was simply fascinating to me but now when I'm little into it or more like know more things about it, the scope of opportunities and growth is worth a lot.

It is difficult to create a successful business from scratch, no matter what the field. Even in the digital world, a lot is required to keep things moving forward. Is the expertise along with resources there to fulfill what is expected?

I heavily agree with this. The scope at which cryptocurrency is developing, both sides of the coin is possible. That is what I was thinking and procrastinating until before I read your post. But, now it seems that the entire sea is vacant and the only tool with which so many things have been possible is once again at stake.

Once before I did give it a thought to, but as no hype surrounded it I let it go. You have penned it too accurately, honestly. The future truly is in our hands, as a community and the process needs to be more strategic than being dealt carelessly.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The second category is obviously one to avoid at all costs. This was most of the ICO craze. White Papers were tossed out there with no intention of completing what was set forth. It was an early version of a rug pull without the name.

@taskmaster4450 And the sad part is that there were alot of people who invested heavily on this platforms simply because they read their whitepapers and think it is reliable enough for investing on the platforms...


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000