Velocity Of Money Continues To Slow

This is not good news. The latest reading of the Velocity of Money, for the 3rd quarter ended showed another decline. This is something that is having a tremendous impact upon the economy.

When the Velocity of Money is slowing, we know there is a problem. This is especially true when we see an expansion of the money supply. Yet, in spite of all that is taking place, we keep seeing declining numbers.

In others words, the growth is not resulting as forecast. This is common when exiting a recession, albeit this one was very brief. Usually, the modus operandi is to stimulate like there is no tomorrow. This leads to some decent numbers, especially Year-over-Year (YoY). The result is that people start screaming about all the money being spent, so the stimulus stops.

Of course, the economy cannot handle it, just like we are seeing now.

Why Is The Velocity Of Money Important?

The Velocity of Money is vital because it shows the relationship between the money supply and GDP. We have a system that believes will we see widespread economic activity during inflationary times. After all, according to the economists with the fancy degrees, people will rush out and buy as prices are increasing. They believe an economic form of FOMO takes place.

Just like most things that deal with economists and the central banks, they have things completely backwards. When prices go up, people spend less. This is especially true when we are dealing with a supply chain shock like we had the last 20 months.

We are seeing the impact on the Velocity of Money. Of course, this is not a new situation. As this chart shows, we got on this path decades ago.

fredgraph 1.png

After peaking in the 1990s, the VoM is on a downward trajectory. Since the onset of COVID, we really plummeted. Since bottoming out, we have one quarter, Q3 2020, where there was a bounce up. After that, it is 4 straight quarters of heading down.

When money is not flowing through the economy, it is hard to attain growth. One scary thing is the USD has the fasted VoM of any of the major currencies. Countries like Japan and China have a rate that is half of what we are seeing in the USD.

Think of it this way: a low VoM means there are a lot of hodlers as opposed to investors. But why would this occur?

QE Is Not Easing

For much of the last 14 years, we had a ton of Quantitative Easing globally. This was started by the Japanese in the early 2000s and the US along with EU jumped on board after the Great Recession. While the US eased up for about 5 years in the 2010s, the EU kept going.

The challenge is that QE does not ease. The name is actually misleading. Instead, it actually tightens financial conditions. This is counter-intuitive yet it is exactly what happens. We saw it for two decades in Japan and now are seeing it throughout the EU and US. In fact, the slowing of growth in China should be no surprise considering what their central bank is doing.

How are tightened conditions tightened?

Simply, the act of easing actually locks more cash into the banking and financial system. Couple this with massive fiscal stimulus and we can see why banks are sitting on a ton of cash while the general economy is suffering from a liquidity crisis.

Part of this is evidenced by the reserve balances. These are the assets the Fed "prints" during their easing. Contrary to what most people believe, the Fed does not create dollars. Their printing is not legal tender.

Here is the chart showing the reserve balances.

fredgraph 2.png

These reserves are on the balance sheets of commercial banks, as assets. They are liabilities to the Fed. We can see from there chart, there is almost $4.2 trillion sitting in reserve accounts at the Fed.

The problem with this is none of this money can be spent on real estate, wages, stock buybacks, or even taxes. It is not legal tender. In fact, the commercial banks have no say when it is converted (swapped) back. This is entirely up to the Fed.

We see this reversed only when the Fed decides to tighten. Short of that, nothing will change. This means the money is all locked up in the financial system, mostly floating around the Repo Market. It is not helping the general economy whatsoever.

For this reason, it is understandable why the VoM is slowing to a snail's pace. There is not enough money in the economy, both US and global (since the USD is the reserve currency). Nevertheless, the Fed has no choice but to keep following this path since they are backed into a corner.

Thus, we can expect economic conditions to keep deteriorating over time.

Even the Fed is expecting this. They have a growth rate of 2.5 in 2023. Keep in mind that last quarter, we saw a preliminary GDP of 2.0. It looks like this chart might be a bit optimistic.

<center<fredgraph 3.png

And people seriously believe the Fed is going to reverse course into that.

By the time, we might have a VoM under 1.0.


If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and rehive.

gif by @doze

screen_vision2025_1.png

logo by @st8z

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
8 comments
avatar

pixresteemer_incognito_angel_mini.png
Bang, I did it again... I just rehived your post!
Week 80 of my contest just started...you can now check the winners of the previous week!
!BEER
3

0
0
0.000
avatar

The Fed and the government thinks everything is going well since the money goes to the rich and powerful. There just isn't enough of it trickling down enough for money to be used.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Do you think once Crypto is mainstream it will be easier for people to understand just what exactly is happening with the economy? I feel like there are a lot of mixed messages being sent and you need to have some pretty high level skill to understand it all (traditional economies). People need something simpler. Or they just keep sticking their heads in the sand. Who knows...

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

The Fed should have started tightening long ago, the writing was on the wall.

When prices go up, people spend less. This is especially true when we are dealing with a supply chain shock like we had the last 20 months.

I agree wholeheartedly with this statement as it applies to luxury goods. But I'm of the opinion that it is inapplicable when considering essentials as the mentality becomes 'buy today as it'll cost more tomorrow' and in such case people are inclined to stock essentials (just look at the toilet paper shortage...).

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

The Fed should have started tightening long ago, the writing was on the wall.

The Fed is only at tapering and they shouldnt even be doing this. There is no way the economy will stand up.

So what will happen, is after a couple months, the markets will take a downturn and the Fed will have to increase it activities.

But I'm of the opinion that it is inapplicable when considering essentials as the mentality becomes 'buy today as it'll cost more tomorrow' and in such case people are inclined to stock essentials (just look at the toilet paper shortage...).

The stocking of essentials I dont think has anything with the idea they will cost more tomorrow. It is more they will not be available.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000