Why to create a special account for a particular tribe ?

avatar
(Edited)

shaman-2897334_1280.jpg

As many of you see, that the rules and ethics may differ in hive and other tribes.

Most of the active tribe members have a special account for a particular tribe !

That's a smart move. And I'll explain why. In the future, I'll do the same for sure !

frame-1868498_1280.jpg

So, even after spending so much time in hive, we have to learn everything about the tribe when we join it. And the way we act in hive could be not acceptable in a particular tribe. Something could be acceptable and even welcome in hive, but not acceptable and even maybe dangerous to do in a particular tribe. So, even if you reach a good position in the tribe, and you do very well, if you break the rule or the ethic of the tribe, you will not be supported that much. Sometimes I see rules and ethics are more important for people than any other useful thing you do. That's why to not waste your time on something else, do your best to learn about the ethics and the rules of the tribe. That could be the most important for a better start !

That order could be created by stakeholders or the team of the tribe. So, sometimes that's even undiscussable. You will have just to accept it. You may say that's the hierarchy that should be respected. Each tribe has a governance, after all. It's just like in open source world. I was reading yesterday about it. A developer told his story about how he started to contribute to it. And he revealed everything about that, including pros and cons. So, in case you are looking for complete freedom to do what you want, just create your own token and tribe and do it your way. Don't always complain about things you don't like, just say your opinion and give solutions you see, and it's up to the team or stakeholders and sometimes even the community to accept it or not. Or accept how a particular tribe work and grow in it, respecting the existing rules.

frame-1868498_1280.jpg

You may say, ''That's not a decentralization !''. I would say, that the decentralization means here mostly of not getting any governments of counties involved. The decentralization doesn't mean the absence of governance at all. Otherwise, how the leaders of any created project could fight the abuse, organize everything and generate income. No one will be able to work in a chaos. Any organization requires a system to apply. Especially if it's not tracked by the law. So, everything is built here on the trust of the members. That's always something we should emphasize.

pobs.png

I'm not a developer and not a contributor in an open source. But I'm a member of many communities and tribes where I mostly observe and experiment to learn. Sometimes I had even to learn it the hard way and may caused harm to myself. But that worth it. Try to follow everything I did to learn from my mistakes and to have a better path.

Even learning could be harmful sometimes. Especially if you're not afraid to say the truth !


Picture source


Posted via proofofbrain.io



0
0
0.000
122 comments
avatar

Each communities has their dos and don'ts and rules governing each tribes.
One can either accept to be humble to learn from the members without breaking the rules or they face the consequences .

But then, what is the Why in creating special account for each tribe?
Is it majorly to follow what ever the tribe does? And if those things aren't in your favor you quit? I don't think i got your point with the title anyway.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

I mean that not all the rules and ethings are the same in hive and each tribe. Each one has its own stakeholders, its own governance and it's hard to act the same when we create content from the same account. I think those accounts are created to not broke the rules of one tribe in case they are creating in an other. I still have only one account for all the tribes, but I think creating an account for each tribe could be maybe better for the growth in each of them.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Oh now I get your point and yes you are right.
But the stress of having to build each of those accounts hmmm.
It will be like neglecting one for the other.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah, that's not easy to do, that's why I have only two. This one to create content and @dcooperation to build the community. I don't think that I will have time for an other one. But, I just shared my opinion about what's going on. You may say for an educational purpose.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I will make sure I denounce any of those tribes if I come across one, rules are for slaves, that of which I am not. That's an insult to my sovereignty to suggest a tribe wouldn't approve of me, they can take their opinion and money and shove it up their ass

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

For example to not spam and to create an original content, isn't that a rule we all respect ? There are ethics like to not self upvote as well, some are respecting that. I don't think that make us slaves, those are just things we do to not abuse the platform.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Yeah I can agree, but the sentiment of changing something about myself to appease the status quo made me throw up in my mouth a little. These slave drives can go back to facebook if they want to see what life is like with rules on social media.

What makes you a slave is needing the rules to live in a world without spam... The rest of us just know when to downvote a shit post.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Trust me, I'm fighting the plagiarims just like you do. You may see how many of that I reported in proofofbrain discord server. Many know about that, I even wrote a post about how to fight plagirism. I even downvoted many of them. I feel everyone responsable of what's going on here. But still there are things should be accepted. For example when ph community asked for beneficiaries to upvote people. Most of those posts were downvoted by stake holders. That's what make them live hive. That a rule they broke.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think the discord groups for hive tribes are for conformists, everytime I enter a so-called "chat" I see repulsive self virtualization and virtue signaling, the same repulsive content that I left Twitter and Facebook to avoid.

Its good you do something about it, but I just use the silent treatment on bottom feeders, its much more effective then they cant play victim and try to blame you cause their little feelings are hurt.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I prefer to use my downvote to get rid of spammers. After reporting them to HiveWatchers and GuiltyParties, to make them stop posting and abusing the reward pool. They now even learned to hide their plagiarims by changing all the text. But, I have now experience to expose them. Usually they have new accounts and they write very long posts with very long titles. And when they reply to a comment, they don't seems know what they talked about in the post. It's even fun to do if someone is looking to fight abuse.

0
0
0.000
avatar

If you ever need help downvoting spam lmk but yeah there is lots for that already.

0
0
0.000
avatar

holy crap.

have you never heard of the mute account button?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Why mute when I can downvote?

0
0
0.000
avatar

(IFF) you are offended by words (THEN) don't read that account

0
0
0.000
avatar

Unfortunately I can't stop the sponsored and advertised posts, which is 99% of the content I downvote.

I only look at my following feeds on ecency, peakd or POB.

There is a promotion service on all of them, and I can figure out how to ad block it, is there a sponsored post blocking service for Hive?

0
0
0.000
avatar

isn't ad blocking functionally indistinguishable from using the mute function ?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I have found if I downvote religious content in the sponsored category, they tell their friends and and none of them use it.

It's more effective with less energetic required for future engagements.

0
0
0.000
avatar

So, you're not a big fan of "freedom of religion" ?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm a big fan of not associating with cults that normalize genocide.

I'd elaborate but then one group might get a chance to be offended and think I am not talking about all theisms in general.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I get it.

You're talking about the cult(ure) that massacred over 12 million people.

In sum, for the entire present-day United States from 1492 to the present, the total
number of Indigenous deaths includes the 12 million estimated by Thornton; the additional
approximately 790,000 deaths that occurred in Hawaii, Alaska, in Puerto Rico; and about
200,000 excess deaths since 1900. Thus, the Indigenous Holocaust in this country appears
to have taken around 13 million lives. Signally, this horrific number of deaths was only a
very small portion of the mind-numbing Holocaust throughout the Western Hemisphere.

SOURCE LINK

0
0
0.000
avatar

holy crap.

have you never heard of the mute account button?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Some may complain even after muting them. lol

0
0
0.000
avatar

hive.blog has optional mute lists you can subscribe to to solve the "spam problem".

i don't understand why everyone's so fired up about people paraphrasing articles.

isn't that like 90% of twitter and facebook ??

doesn't every newsroom on earth paraphrase the associated press or reuters or bloomberg ??

if a corporation posts the exact same image and text a thousand times, isn't that "spam" ??

why doesn't @hivewatchers consider memes and gifs "copyrighted material" ??

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't care about something rephrased. I report clear plagiarims when people just copy past text from the web. Why some should write their original content and get nothing from that, but a spammer just by copy pasting and looking so great should get it all. The reward people is limited and if it will given all to spamers, nothing will be left to original content. About pictures, there are so many websites with free pictures and gifs to use.

0
0
0.000
avatar

what would you call this ?
https://hive.blog/leofinance/@hivewatcher/quwvr8

And,

most gifs, especially from giphy.com are not licensed and no "attribution" is provided, even though they contain copyrighted images.

And,

copying an article and reposting it (with attribution) is simply news aggregation (like google news or yahoo news) which could also be called "curation".

people do this on twitter and facebook all day without fear of being "blacklisted" or "downvoted into oblivion".

Also, "original content" is often BORING.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Why should we be like facebook ? I didn't get it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

the hive kings are always ranting about how they want HIVE to be just as popular as facebook and twitter, that's why i mention them.

onboarding, onboarding, onboarding.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Why do you think @phusionphil downvoted you?

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

If I was downvoted because of the picture, here is the source : https://pixabay.com/ru/photos/%d1%88%d0%b0%d0%bc%d0%b0%d0%bd-%d0%b4%d1%83%d1%85%d0%be%d0%b2%d0%bd%d1%8b%d0%b5-%d0%b4%d1%83%d1%85-%d0%bf%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%b9-%d0%bc%d0%b0%d0%b3%d0%b8%d1%8f-2897334/

They also say that's :

All are free for commercial use and no attribution required!

So, why I should add the source or not use it ? It's free to use !

Do you know what's Creative Commons ?

0
0
0.000
avatar

So, why I should add the source or not use it ? It's free to use !

I agree, but I've also seen @hivewatchers address pixabay images specifically, and they say that you need a link, even for CCZERO, if only to prove that you have not simply forgotten to post the "attribution" link.

0
0
0.000
avatar

If that's needed from @hivewatchers to make it easy for them to check posts, I will add the link. I have no problem doing that.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That's another problem.

People get downvoted and they don't know why.

0
0
0.000
avatar

They have a brain to think and the will to ask. We all were new here and didn't know a lot of things, but we all learned. Sometimes in a very hard way, but we learned !

0
0
0.000
avatar

the point here is, who the fuck are @hivewatchers and why do they get to make rules that don't make any sense and why do people just let them dish out their amorphous version of vigilante "justice" with no "trial" and no reasonable "path to redemption" or appeal.

they're just schoolyard bullies parading as "heroes".

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hivewatchers do this work because they have support from the vast majority of the community, whales, and witnesses. If there were no support, Hivewatchers would stop working right away. And they have had support since 2016.
So no. You are actually the one who is trying to make the rules on this platform.
Also, the only ones who do not like or troll Hivewatchers work are almost always these who have come to the platform to exploit/scam it or with an agenda to spread lies and dangerous disinformation (Lies/dangerous disinformation like qAnoon, Anti-vaxxing, flat earth, NWO, Reptilian Illuminati, plandemic, etc.).
The first group confuses the freedom of speech with the freedom to scam.
The second group confuses the freedom of speech with the freedom to lies and spread dangerous disinformation.

0
0
0.000
avatar

IF YOU ONLY SUPPORT SPEECH YOU AGREE WITH, YOU DON'T SUPPORT FREE SPEECH.

IF YOU ONLY SUPPORT RELIGION YOU AGREE WITH, YOU DON'T SUPPORT FREEDOM OF RELIGION.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I downvoted him for insulting my sovereignty with the Hive discord groups, suggesting I should join something as repulsive as a social club that has a status quo, is offensive to me.

0
0
0.000
avatar

So, not something they could have predicted.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Lol was he mad that I didn't warn him and provide him with a ToS for this decentralized blockchain lol

0
0
0.000
avatar

DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD WISH THEM TO DO UNTO YOU

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

What goes around comes around, unless the author was questioning the rewards pool, I never downvote a good debate even if I disagree.

0
0
0.000
avatar

i thought you said you downvoted this post because you disagreed.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's not a debate, and if it was the formating in the article didn't resemble a debate, I disagree with the status quo in all contents of its use.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ok, so you had a "difference of opinion" and you were unwilling to "debate" even though you were having a "conversation" about that "difference of opinion" ?

What's the quantifiable distinction between a conversation about a difference of opinion and a "debate" ?

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

logical fallacies would be considered unacceptable in a debate, a difference of opinion could be 2 children fighting over who can eat the most cookies before telling mom on each other.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I've seen quite a few formal debates, and logical fallacies usually win the day.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm the guy who didn't joint the debate class because I was too busy playing sports, getting baked and focused on the hedonist roots of my carnal instincts.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The rest of us just know when to downvote a shit post.

Anyone who either can't or won't provide reasons for their actions is, by definition, "unreasonable".

0
0
0.000
avatar

Unwilling to discuss and unreasonable are 2 different things in my books.

When something is of the quality of something I would find on the bottom of my boot, then I would discard of it immediately and with haste, having no intention to revisit the thought that didn't contribute to my quality of living.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Unwilling to discuss and unreasonable are 2 different things in my books.

They are functionally indistinguishable.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Crypto decentralization simply means taking away power from a single type of entity. Uh, not governments, but banks and "tax-free" megacorps. But there is always some form of governance anywhere you go.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Governments now control all those fields as well. So, by saying governments, I meant all those as well !

0
0
0.000
avatar

Eh, I can't see it that way. Governments are controlled by bankers and megacorps, not the other way around. I think having people blaming "governments" is something bankers and megacorps want you to do, so they can get away with their crap while politicians serve as sock puppets.

0
0
0.000
avatar

They are all related anyway. The main beneficiary is not the citizen for sure !

0
0
0.000
avatar

ANARCHY = NO KINGS
ANARCHY = DEMOCRACY
ANARCHY = NO PRIESTS NO PROPHETS NO OLIGARCHS
ANARCHY = NO "LEADERS" ONLY "PUBLIC SERVANTS"

ANARCHY = BLOCKCHAIN
ANARCHY = HOLACRACY
ANARCHY = TRANSPARENCY
ANARCHY = PROCRUSTEAN LAW

0
0
0.000
avatar

There are leaders though, they're just a lot harder to see. I.e, the main leadership behind BTC decided to turn keep things as they were, but people who opposed them forked the coin into BCH. Why did the opposite not happen? Why wasn't the BCH side of the fork keeping the original name of the coin? Because they were not the main group. The same thing happens with every coin. They always have their own leaders.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The idea is that everyone is forced to abide by the same set of transparent rules.

In BTC, that means that each miner gets to vote on what version they will run.

It also means that anyone can fork the chain if they want.

0
0
0.000
avatar

each miner

mining is centralized

0
0
0.000
avatar

how is mining centralized ?

0
0
0.000
avatar
  1. there are only a handful of mining pools. this will only make sense if you understand the influence they have
  2. very few people do most of the mining. like when one city had a blackout in china but that instantly cut mining power by over 30%
0
0
0.000
avatar

sure.

but 30% is not exactly "centralized"

there is no "king of bitcoin" who can act unilaterally

you don't have to fill out any forms or ask anyone for permission to set up your own mining rig

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

but 30% is not exactly "centralized"

yeah it's not like 30% of all mining power belonging to a single person is meaningful, you are right, it's obviously my mistake. that doesn't say anything about this issue at all

I mean even if we could attribute 97% of all power to four or five people, that obviously wouldn't be centralized, amiright? because centralized means something entirely different. I realize that's the case with bitcoin because of pools, but that doesn't change anything. do you know why? this is why:

because what's reaaaaally important is how I don't have to fill out any forms if I want to mine. now it all makes sense! it's only centralized if we have to fill out forms! if we don't have to fill out forms, then it's not centralized!!

that's where the magic lies! it doesn't matter what anyone says, ever, simply because there is no form-filling involved! yeees now I see it

110%

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yep, people think decentralization means absence of rules, it’s very wrong, decentralization means people can come together to define the set of rules of behavior instead of one entity doing it...

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

ANARCHY = NO KINGS
ANARCHY = DEMOCRACY
ANARCHY = NO PRIESTS NO PROPHETS NO OLIGARCHS
ANARCHY = NO "LEADERS" ONLY "PUBLIC SERVANTS"

ANARCHY = BLOCKCHAIN
ANARCHY = HOLACRACY
ANARCHY = TRANSPARENCY
ANARCHY = PROCRUSTEAN LAW

0
0
0.000
avatar

I know someone who created a new account and was doing so well in a particular community, then one day, disaster struck

She ignorantly broke a rule, and the downvotes she got demoralized her, and she dish that account

It sounds good to have all the rules and governance as you say we should

But creating more than one account in order to stay abrass with the community rules can be very stressful

One cannot serve two masters at the same time l


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Disasters do not struck when one inadvertently breaks the rules. They struck when one breaks the rules and goes on to be an asshole about it. For me, rage-quitting counts as being an asshole towards oneself.
When you are not, you can apologise and work your way back up sooner or later.

It is not like XY is nice on Hive so they need to create XY.leo account to be nice on Leo doing different stuff. They do it to optimise curation, voting differently with different tokens. I assume there are people running multiple accounts to cash in on being Jekyll and Hyde but these need to be named differently.

0
0
0.000
avatar

For me, rage-quitting counts as being an asshole towards oneself

Who is this guy? Dude, pay attention before you speak.

I didn't say she quit because she was angry

I used the word "demoralize" check it up. It is different


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

This guy thinks he is the almighty master of the universe. Believe me I keep getting downvotes from him, at first because I broke a rule, then because I upvoted my own posts, now even when I don't upvote my posts anymore, he keeps on hitting me with downvotes...

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is crazy

But don't get all worked up because of one person

There are many more lovely people in here on this space

Work your way around and find them

Once you do, you will be glad you did

Cheers


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Mainstream Hive is a difficult game to play when you talk to people like that but fortunately there is enough troll huts around here for everyone to find a place to hang out.

0
0
0.000
avatar

100% THIS

they love to crush accounts for "copyright" and "plagiarism" and even "paraphrasing"

but then do nothing to stop copyrighted images in memes and gifs

and top accounts post movie reviews, which are basically 100% "paraphrasing"

"unoriginal content" is everywhere

0
0
0.000
avatar

ANARCHY = NO KINGS

ANARCHY = DEMOCRACY

ANARCHY = NO PRIESTS NO PROPHETS NO OLIGARCHS

ANARCHY = NO "LEADERS" ONLY "PUBLIC SERVANTS"

0
0
0.000
avatar

ANARCHY = BLOCKCHAIN

ANARCHY = HOLACRACY

ANARCHY = TRANSPARENCY

ANARCHY = PROCRUSTEAN LAW

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

I'm reading now about Anarchy in wikepedia, I'm thinking how they deal with crimes. I mean real crimes, like killing, stealing, and other type of crimes that cause harm to others. I also don't like governments and what they are doing especially with the fakedemic they are creating and the fear they are spreding. But, I'm thinking how anarchists would deal with clear crimes in their society.

0
0
0.000
avatar

TRIAL BY JURY

ALGORAND has implemented a nearly perfect system.

Any transaction (not user) can only be flagged once.

When a transaction is flagged, 1000 random users are notified.

If a user fails to respond within the time limit, another randomly selected user is notified (this process continues until at least 600 votes have been cast).

60% of the jury must agree in order to cancel a transaction.

If 41% of the jury votes to uphold a transaction, then the transaction remains unaffected and is never "held-pending-trial" or any nonsense during the procedure.

There is a small dividend provided by the system for jury participation, and an additional small incentive for voting with the majority (if there is no 60% on either side, this additional incentive is not awarded).

0
0
0.000
avatar

ALSO HOLACRACY

0
0
0.000
avatar

Are there such people in real world ? Do they have a community or a place where they live and protect themselves from goverments ? For example someone like The Dollar Vigilante is also anarchist maybe. He's revieling so many secrets and facts and truth about what they are all doing. I guess he's protected somehow. I know many stories where people if say something against goverments could be put in jail or punished somehow. I usually watch his videos in lbry : https://lbry.tv/@DollarVigilante:b . I'm sure you know him.

I would like also to know if you like him or not and what's he's doing !

I would like to learn more about this movment.

I don't feel I have a secure future in Russia now.

I don't know if such people exist here or not.

I'm just learning and finding more and more frauds in the system we live. I need to do something about that before it's too late. Especially being against vaccination not trusting anything going on.

0
0
0.000
avatar

There are over 1000 corporations that have implemented holacracy.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I would like also to know if you like him or not and what's he's doing !

I've watched some of his vids but I don't know the details of his "community".

I would imagine it's something very much like these examples,

I would like to learn more about this movment.

0
0
0.000
avatar

What do you think about ALLATRAUNITES. They are also creating something like that, but I don't trust them that much. There are some confusions about them.

https://www.facebook.com/allatraunites.en/

They call it Creative Society and they have a kind of an intrnational communities and they always promised of big changes. Then I see nothing changed and goverments keep pushing their agenda.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmohunWoXmNj0ZAHt_idLEw

They look too positve for me.

I don't like those who looks like that and call people to join them. I've seen enough of such communities in my life. It's hard to trust them.

What's your opinion about them ? They seems pushing for interesting ideas , but I don't see the change in the world.

I think we need something else to stop the evil from spreading, experimenting on people, creating restrictions and everything.

The world need a big revolution I think.

And the sad thing that more and more people are brainwatshed !

0
0
0.000
avatar

The world need a big revolution I think.

YEP

And the sad thing that more and more people are brainwatshed !

100% THIS

I'm not sure if Russia has jury trials, but the concept was the original "safe-guard" against TYRANNY.

0
0
0.000
avatar

One person decide lives, that's sad.

0
0
0.000
avatar

If that one person is a "judge", how is that any "better"?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I meant the judge. I think many people should do such work and it should be looked in the crime again and again and evidence found. A judge can be just bribed and the person will speand a part of his life in prison, or all of it. Even prison is not that good, they don't educate there people but create criminals sometimes and when someone get out from prison will not get better but worse. This is the world we live in. Could we change it ? I don't think so. I'm almost sure that humanity will destroy itself by themselves. After 1000 from now I don't see any human beings living in this earth. They seems don't deserve it. Humanity did a lot of bad things. Including to themselves, to animals and now they are doing that even to nature. Like just destroying this earth. Prefering companies to keep poluing the envirment, but people should breath less with those masks. I'm sure if we had an other system, the wealth will be enough for all of us and all people will have better life. But it is what is is. Nothing will save humanity I think. I will keep being positive and thinking that some magic will happen, but from what I see, it's the end for humanity, we are closing that moment faster and fasted.

0
0
0.000
avatar

and when someone get out from prison will not get better but worse.

100% THIS

This is the world we live in. Could we change it ? I don't think so.

I think you're in the right head-space, take a look at this,

0
0
0.000
avatar

By the way, I created recently an interview and I would like to interview you as well. I think we will have a lot to discuss if you want. We may do it in a form of podcast. Do you want to participate in it ? I'll be happy to interview you !

0
0
0.000
avatar

That sounds interesting, are you perhaps on discord ?

0
0
0.000
avatar

A Remedy for Legal Failure: Trial by Jury in Russia

image.png
https://geohistory.today/remedy-legal-failure-russia/

0
0
0.000
avatar

The same what's happenig in other countries is in Russia now. Putin can say somethnig today and something else will be done in all the country. A few days ago he said that we will respect the constition and not create mandatory vaccination, yesterday the main doctor in Moscow with the help of the mere said they will vaccinate 60% or workers and it's ok to fire people from their work. You say anything against the goverments you may be arrested as well.

People are for sure easy manipulated here. A lot watch the tv. They can kill each other for little things they didn't like, but they will not go against the goverment. Like showing to all the world that they are most strong, most manly, in the end so many weared masks even in car or in a part when no one is arround.

Russia is not soviet uninion now. But it could be something worse. A lot of hidden things people don't know about the leaders of the country. Even the central bank is strange here, it's like an independent bank that can do almost anything they want. Even money is strange. The russian rouble, it's like 75 rouble = 1 dollar, but the course of soviet rouble still published in central bank even for 2021. Like it's hiher than a dollar. It's like 1 soviet roulbe may bring 2 dollars. All oficial from the main website of central bank of Russia : https://www.cbr.ru/currency_base/GosBankCurs/

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ok, I understand the initial repulsion of "cult" groups, especially the overtly religious,

However, it's important to remember that you are already a member of a cult (cult-ure).

I try not to buy-into or reject any group 100% either way.

All you need to determine is if the group in question is "less-wrong" than the one you already find yourself in.

Here's another practical example,

0
0
0.000
avatar

They look like a cult for sure !

I thought you know such people who could be saved from the medical and political teranny going on against all citizens in the world !

0
0
0.000
avatar

ANARCHY isn't about joining a team.

ANARCHY is about making your own team.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I find it difficult to grasp the idea of different accounts for tribes. I don't bother myself with it. One account. If I want I use the tribe's tag in my post. I normally keep it civil so I don't have to bother much with rules.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That's a good choise as well. Even me for now I have only @clixmoney and I just see how many people have each account for a particular tribe. Of course that may consume them a lot of time, but I don't have much of it. Especially being the founder of @dcooperation , the community I should take about now and create collaborations in hive !

0
0
0.000
avatar

I read your recent article and get that #dcc is more about the promotion of articles that we like than about putting the #dcc in our own article. Is that understanding right?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah, promoting comments as well you liked. You may use the tag only if you are promoting a comment of someone else or his/her post and mentioning them. It's also cool to write at least what do you think at least in one sentence. That will exaplain why you liked a comment or a post. I mean only promoting others comment or post is allowing anyone to use the tag.

That way, more people will be promoted, more quality content upvotes and even curators when they look for a good content, they will just go to #dcc tag and find something there interesting to consume and the promoted posts or links at the same time.

If more people will do it, more will be interested in promoting others and more curators will support the content created on the tag.

It's a collaborative curation from all hive community and I hope the idea will be promoted very well, so the tag will be popular !

0
0
0.000
avatar

Okay, get that. A noble idea and endeavor indeed! 😃😃

0
0
0.000
avatar

I hope to see you sometimes creating such posts. The idea is for sure awesome and now we need some activity on it. I'll write about promoting comments later. Just didn't have much time. Because in the first posts I talekd only about posts. And I'm trying to curate those posts, I check #dcc everyday. So, for now I have about 33k hive power to use to support that. Maybe @starstrings01 also will support it sometimes. He seems very interested and he has also about 19k hive power to curate that. Maybe you join as well.

Curating is not necessary by the way. The most important to find people participating in it by sharing the posts and comments of others. I think if a few people start this, it will be already famous and we may create really a useful movement on the blockchain.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't have much time to curate, but I do go through few posts in the morning. When I do it, I will for sure tag #dcc if I like them. I hope that is fine to start with.

0
0
0.000
avatar

For sure, I'll be just happy to see you doing it.

0
0
0.000