RE: A New Store of Value?
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I just really think that the curators here should be taking more of a responsibility around rewarding content that's duplicated everywhere else across the web.
For me, the only thing that matters when measuring the success of LeoFinance is traffic and the best source of ongoing traffic is through organic Google rankings.
Traffic means ad revenue which means token burns and a price floor on LEO.
If content is duplicated and Google views the other content as the original article, then that has a negative effect on our domain and as a result, our investment.
This is where I'm coming from when I sent the message.
Just something for you and any curators who read this to consider.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
As far as I can see, Leofinance articles go automatically reblogged at Peakd (and I don't know where else) anyway. And vise versa, an article from Peakd goes automatically reblogged at Leofinance.
I understand what you mean, but from what I know of Mr. Matt Cutts's theories, so-called "duplicated content" is not an issue since a long time ago. Google just prioritizes the copy it indexed first, not penalizes others. However, my SEO knowledge is outdated for like five years at least, maybe something changed since then.
Anyway, I think I've found a trade-off solution.
And it would be good indeed if "the curators" make their say on that. I will probably make a post on that later, maybe it will get some response.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta