RE: Leo and Kanda
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Alliances and helping other projects is always a great idea. However, it is up to us to determine how to best to do that. It is easy to look to those who started or are active in a project to handle it yet that is not how decentralization works.
If there is an opportunity for LEO and KANDA to help each other out, it is up to us who hold those tokens to put ideas into practice. How can we cross pollinate both platforms for dual benefit?
That is the question.
Posted Using LeoFinance
0
0
0.000
This is why I mentioned the value of stakeholder-ship and thank you for your comment. Spreading out value in the form of token early is important. When I look at richlist there seem to be few holding medium amount and less holding large amounts.
This is too much greed (no offense and not to Leo especially since it doesn't apply to them), how does a platform expect to be valued high if it holds onto everything! You got to give half if not more out. Bitcoin release half so quick!
Posted Using LeoFinance
You are correct there is a lot of greed although, as more projects come online and there are more "Whales" in each project, the wealth spreads out.
LEO, as an example, is getting into more hands as his KANDA. In terms of HIVE, neither is at that level yet but either (or both) could end up being as valuable (on a per token basis). That would change the lives of many through just those two tokens.
Posted Using LeoFinance
The question is not so much about cross platform. But look at kanda applications and how little value. Their model seems to need Leo help. Leo can make themselves a stakeholder just by consulting to Kanda. Making both more valuable if Leo were to burn Kanda.
Sorry forgot to answer that!
Posted Using LeoFinance