The Population Crisis Is Going To Cause Economic Issues

There is an population crisis arising and it is about to blow up in our face.

No, it isn't the risk of overpopulation. That myth should be put to rest. The world is going to end up with an underpopulation crisis if things continue on the same path.

Unlike the mindset of a few decades ago, people are now starting to realize that birth rates are dropping in many parts of the world. This is causing counties to face a prospect similar to Japan. As populations age, a host of problems are created, both socially and economically.

For the past 25 years, Japan has wrestled with this problem yet came up with no solution. This is bad news since a number of other countries are already going down this path.

image.png
Source

Birth rates in many Western countries are down. In fact, they are so far down, they are below replacement level. This is generally considered to be 2.1 children for each mother.

Some countries like Russia were below this for more than a decade. The population of that country is starting to shrink. The same is true for Italy, Spain, and now Germany. All peaked or are close to it.

Even the United States is having a major issue. The pandemic and associated lockdowns were thought to spur a baby boom. After all, people locked up at home with nothing to do, well why not fill the time with sex? It appears the exact opposite happened. While there is a lack of numbers on the amount of sex people had, they do exist on the birth rates as a result of the pandemie.

And they are not pretty.

Nine months after the first lockdowns began in the US, the number of births in the country had declined by 7%, according to data provided to CBS News by health departments across more than 24 states. And fertility rates - the number of live births a woman is expected to have over her lifetime - are already lower in the first few months of 2021, said Christine Percheski, associate professor of sociology at Northwestern University.

Source

This is going to result in 300K-500K fewer births for the year.

It continues a pre-pandemic trend that saw the U.S. fertility rate come in at 1.73 births per mother. This is far below the 2.1 needed.

This situation will likely weaken the United States. Since it is a consumption driven economy, an aging population means that people consume less. Older people do not buy new homes, cars, or pay for college education. With less children, companies that cater to that segment of the market are going to have difficult. Toy R Us, one of the top chains for toys went out of business a couple years ago. The combination of online shopping along with fewer kids meant lower revenues.

From a geopolitical perspective, this should help China. However, for those who are bullish on that country, all is not rosy either. While it is the heavily populated, with 1.4 billion people, this is near the peak.

In fact, it is now estimated that they are done expanding in just 4 years.

China’s population is set to peak in just four years’ time and the milestone will be marked by a significant downturn in consumer demand, said Cai Fang, a member of the monetary policy committee of the People’s Bank of China, the central bank.

“When the total population enters negative growth (after 2025), there will be a shortage of demand," Cai was quoted as saying by Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post on Sunday

Source

Unlike the United States, China does not have an economy based upon consumption but, rather, exports. They are trying to become a consumption based economy. This is obviously going to be wrought with difficulty if the population is peaking.

Of course, there are still the exports. The problem for China is the largest market it caters to is the United States. If Americans are getting older, they will reduce the amount of stuff they buy.

Another challenge for that country: the second biggest market it caters to is Western Europe. On that continent, only Israel is above replacement rate.

As we progress through this century, India and Nigeria are expected to see their populations grow. However, this is not a guarantee.

We find that as the economic circumstances of a country improve, the birthrates tend to decline. There are a number of reason for this. As people get educated, they tend to put off having children, especially women who enter the workforce. Also, access to better healthcare and birth control certainly factors in. Finally, as an economy shifts away from agriculture, less hands are needed to support the family.

All of this tends to mean less children.

The result eventually is an economy that is upside down. Older people require more social services than younger people. For this to work, there needs to be production to support those extracting from the system. Unfortunately, with demographic shifts, countries lack the people to generate the revenues needed to pay for said services.

This is the situation that Japan is still mired in. And it is one that much of the rest of the world is about to experience too.

Automation is going to be a big factor going forward. While it will cause a lot of job loss, much of it will come from the fact that it is needed to make up for the shortfall of workers.

These might become more commonplace as we progress through the next few decades.

image.png
Source


If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and rehive.

gif by @doze

screen_vision2025_1.png

logo by @st8z

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
39 comments
avatar

The population always plays a major factor in a countries economic outlooks. Its age, growth or decline rate, and the higher demands of an aging populations. The baby boomers have always been a math issue for the US. Not matter what you do, you can't have that many boomers, leave the work force, and start to claim benefits, while having significantly reduced people working, lower paying jobs and contributing less to those programs.

While before this always looked like a short term gap of a few decades until the problem corrected and became more balanced, decreasing birth rates will just compound the impact and the struggles we will face to continue to keep these pay as you go programs afloat without ever increasing taxes.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

In the United States, the Boomers are at least offset by the Millennials. This is something that Western Europe, in particular, did not have. They had their Boomer generation but sans the offspring.

Hence they are in the situation you describe. The US is starting to feel the lack of Millennial offspring. This will come to hurt it decades down the road.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I would agree with the exception of sub-Saharan Africa which is a demographic time bomb of cray proportions.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The birth rate in sub sahara Africa was cut in half. It is now down to 5 births per mother, from 10 a couple decades ago. Sure it is still a lot but as the area gets more economically viable, the birthrates will continue to plummet.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

pixresteemer_incognito_angel_mini.png
Bang, I did it again... I just rehived your post!
Week 53 of my contest just started...you can now check the winners of the previous week!
!BEER
1

0
0
0.000
avatar

Reminds me of this always-wonderful video by Kurzgesagt, explaining why overpopulation is not a thing for the same reasons you describe.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

In several Communist countries, they used to impose rules for people to have more than 1 child years ago. If you only had one, you would miss some...benefits, they called them. And for each child, they offered a financial incentive. Abortions were severely punished also...
Great article regarding the socio-economical aspects, globally.
Thank you for this!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Many countries are offering incentives including Russia. It does not seem to be working.

China went from the 1 child policy to now the two child policy. Unfortunately, many believe it is too late. The simply numbers cannot be corrected in a few years. When the previous generation is smaller, it is harder to compensate.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thats actually really concerning but it is tied to the economy. Just like with animals if there isn't enough food sources available then birthing rates reduce.

The world's economy was already massively impacted by wealth distribution and the fact that work does not allow people to raise families. Where does a family have the time? Today's world requires both parents to work with child care set at astronomical prices doubled down with a perceived ending world naturally birth rates will reduce.

Money and time is the problem yet no one is addressing it.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Money is a part of the problem but it is not how you are describing. For many it is an issue yet we find that as countries grow economically fertility rates go down. Women choose to delay births/put them off altogether. This leads to lower rates ending up having an economic impact.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Days have long changed when mum could stay home and be a house wife, not even dad can stay home. We're facing a world where incomes are at their highest but people are also time poor.

Things need to change, I was hoping COVID would unlock alot of that but unfortunately the city takes priority over humans and we are being ushered back in.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Unlike Japan, the U.S. has the potential to gain lots and lots of of young people. Trumpists may whine about it no end, but there are plenty of young immigrants quite eager to enter the American workforce. And bring their children with them.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

That is true the US has always done well with immigration. Of course, the problem with that is the first generation is unskilled labor. It takes a generation, at least, to get assimilated, educated, etc...

I dont know if you are aware but the future for unskilled labor is not that great due to automation.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Often, but not always. Also, it takes a generation because of our current education system. That could be fixed by enough to make fit generation immigrants more relevant to our economy.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It doesn't help that some people want to start injecting hormones into children before they can make a conscious decision. The poor stuff that happened in LA where they were injecting prison juveniles only makes me think that the situation will get worst.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I would give a fuck if this crises wouldn't save the Earth in the long run. We can't multiply ad infinitum on the finite planet.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Funny how we keep being able to produce more on a finite planet.

I guess that doesnt fit the narrative.

What is in scarce supply.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

More than what? At some point you hit the limits, and we are going to hit those sooner than we think. There are no much asteroids to mine clear water and air. It's XIX century discovery that forrest can't be cut without restrictions and planting the new one. You are talking a lot about exponential growth, production of trash, fertilizers, pesticides and CO2 emissions are growing exponentially too.

We are not simply "migrating to the digital", we are adding digital layer to our physical lifes, which still are rooted in our ability to sustain life-supporting environment. Cheers!

0
0
0.000
avatar

No it's not, that's why they got corona to kill all the midwits off! lol hope u take you Vax!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Very interesting I never thought about the population replacement theory and how that impacts a consumer market. Time to rebalance the portfolio.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes and hot it applies to different countries/economics.

We also see it in different sectors. Companies where the market is older people will do well. Those like Toy R us that go after the younger ones are going to struggle.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

It hits home as I a person who does not have children and older generations always ask when we are planning to have kids...

0
0
0.000
avatar

The mounting sovereign debt levels are to a large degree the result of the bad demographics. And the debt situation is partially what fuels the need money printing because interest rates cannot be allowed to go too high. Bitcoin wins.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well in Japan maybe. But most countries havent hit is yet (they are close).

Hence I would say the sovereign debt situation is due to massive spending fueled by debt which didnt produce the growth needed to sustain it.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well in Japan maybe. But most countries havent hit is yet (they are close).

I would say many European countries are already there. Not all of them but many are.

Hence I would say the sovereign debt situation is due to massive spending fueled by debt which didnt produce the growth needed to sustain it.

Exactly. Spending on social services does not produce much growth. That's, of course, only a part of the equation. Much of it is due to the mismatch of what the labor market demands and what job applicants can offer.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Pretty much what Bill Gates has dreamed of. A world depopulation. Luckily robots will take our places in many working sectors, but they can't have babies.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes he did dream of it yet he still wants to go kill hundreds of thousands of Africans because he still believes it will be a problem.

The guy is a total psychopath.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

100% true.
He's dragged a lot of hate upon him. It's amazing how obedient and naïve humanity has become.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is only anecdotal evidence on my part but I know my two 30 something children are no where near starting families. Mostly for economic reasons and probably a little worry over what kind of dystopian future kids born today may have to endure.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

What dystopia are you referring to?

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Climate change would be one. Our fire seasons here in the western US seem to be getting longer and more intense. We just had a red flag warning in the mountains in April. It is very rare to have an April red flag fire warning here. Last fall, fires were burning close enough to Portland Or that some suburbs were put on evacuation notice.

Another possible pandemic. I wasn't overly impressed with humanities response to this last one.

And I never underestimate government or powerful people's ability to royally screw things up for us all. :)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Not just anecdotal. I'm in may 30's and nowhere near starting a family for these reasons. The same goes for 90% of my friends. This is going to be a real problem.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Come to think of it not many of their friends that I know of have started families either.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Russia and other countries that are not attractive to your average migrant will suffer from population crisis but the US will not, because the US has millions of people living south of it's border that are willing risk their life to get a chance to work there, once the labor shortage becomes acute, the working visas will start flowing. Most western countries will have a social and ethnic crisis rather than just a population crisis because of the need for more and more migrant workers. Japan has a very strict immigration policy and that's why they haven't manage to find a solution to their population crisis and demonstrates that you either accept migrants and keep growing or you stagnate.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

And yet a hot topic is the sustainability of a growing world population, not a potential underpopulation crisis.

Maybe those who control the world believe the mankind's future generations will grow in a lab. Then, natality becomes irrelevant.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Now I'm at my desk, I've returned the favour. This post really interested me and I'm going to pose another conundrum: massive and international youth unemployment. It's what sparked the Arab spring and some of the riots in France and the UK. It's a huge issue in South Africa where our unemployment rate is the highest it's ever been - thanks to the pandemic - and where most of our young people are unemployed. Whether "qualified" or not. IMO this is a recipe for ongoing unrest and disaster. These young ones are fertile ground for populism and the re-emergence of fanatical left- and right-wing movements. And, we're seeing this happen.

The other thing I'm also seeing - here anyway - is that millennials are taking neither the energy of youth nor the value of maturity of experience seriously. Apologies if you're in that category - I do get that it's a generalisation - but it seems to me that the moment one of them gets into a leadership position, they throw out (virtually the baby and the bathwater) and start from scratch. Result: loss of institutional depth, skills and competence. Again, IMO, there is a lot to be said for multi-generational teams and the shared value they can bring. Energy and experience - as long as there's good glue - is a great combination. A digression, but, I think, connected to the broad preoccupations you're discussing.

Never, in my nearly 60 years have I worried more about what's going on in the world.

Rant over.

Good day!

0
0
0.000