Zuckerberg And Dorsey Going Broke?

avatar

Can billionaires go broke? Sure, if they make boneheaded moves by being overleveraged and assuming too much risk. However, neither of these individuals are in that category.

image.png
Source

So, how can the heads of two of the largest social media companies in the world go broke? What force is big enough to take them down?

The answer is rather simple but the means is a bit convoluted.

Red Or Blue

There is little dispute which way these two individuals, as well as their companies, lean. It is not doubt they fit into the "blue" camp.

Throughout the last election, social media proved to be very useful to the Democrats in the pursuit of defeating Trump. Throughout the election, Trump found himself harassed and, ultimately, banned from the platforms.

The mission was accomplished. Trump was disposed of and now Biden occupies the White House. All is well in the world for the blue pill people.

Thou Shalt Not Switch Pills

Mega-technology is drunk with power. This is most would agree with. Just think back to Zuckerberg in front of Congress with his smug attitude. Granted the fossils in the Senate had no clue what he was talking about. However, that doesn't absolve him of his attitude and the fact that he believes he is above reproach.

After all, he owns so much Facebook stock that he is untouchable in that company, which is one of the largest in the world.

Of course, as much of an ally that the social media companies were during the campaign, they could easily become a threat.

There is nothing to say that they would switch camps and become red pill leaning yet those in power are not going to leave anything to chance. After all, they are presently looking to implement an agenda.

Those Shalt Not Cross Washington

The establishment was honed over decades. There is no way to doubt how much they centralized power while insulating themselves. One of Trump's problems was that he danced into Washington believing that he would "clean the place up".

What Trump did not understand, at least going in, that he was an outsider. Regardless of party, those in the Beltway stick together. They might oppose the other side of the aisle but they will join forces to obliterate outsiders.

This is something that Trump had to learn the hard way.

Of course, with Trump quarantined, there is now a new threat to those in power.

Big Tech did a remarkable job of consolidating power. They set up their entire models around the idea of "winner take most". This allowed them to get enormous in size, generate billions of dollars, and amass incredible power.

In short, power outside of Washington is not going to be allowed.

Anti-Competitive Practices Targeted

President Biden just signed an Executive Order that goes after the anti-competitive practices of these type of companies. This was a rather drastic move when the full scope of the action is looked at.

There are 72 actions and recommendations spelled out, involving dozens of federal agencies. The bottom line is the Feds are not playing around.

The idea is that Big Tech uses their size to keep smaller competitors out as well as abusing people's personal information.

While this makes sense on the surface, there is something far more threatening to these companies.

Biden's Order has a directive to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to challenge prior mergers that previous administrations allowed to go through.

This means that the government can go in and split these companies apart. Any acquisition that is now deemed anti-competitive could be unwound. For example, Facebook's Instagram, which was acquired earlier in the last decade could face a forced sale under the new directive.

Threat To "National Security"

It could get worse for these entities.

If Washington really started to push the matter, it could deem these companies a threat to national security. After all, it is looking like a power threat to those inside the Beltway.

Would any of this fly constitutionally? It seems like this will not matter a great deal. We see how corrupt the system really is, from top to bottom. The public is losing trust in all branches, the Executive, Legislature, and Judicial and for good reason.

It is safe to say that they all cover for each other on important matters. Rights of individual, private citizens are secondary to their wishes.

All of this could lead to the holdings drastically reduced these two through outright seizure or via the diminishing of the entities they own. Since their power is a threat to Washington, it is not going to be tolerated.

These Companies Will Be Hurt

History is littered with individuals and companies that were targeted by the United States Government. This rarely ends well for the ones who are under the microscope.

This really has little to do with opening up competition. The reality is that Big Tech is a threat to the power in Washington.

Unfortunately, that is an arena filled with career politicians and bureaucrats. They feel little to no responsibility to anyone outside their circle.

The likes of Zuckerberg and Dorsey are going to find what this means. Whereas they were on the right side of things last year, now they are in the hot seat. This is going to cost them big time.

Even if they end up prevailing, the fight is going to be long and drawn out. Instead of focusing upon growing their businesses, we can expect more trips to Washington.

Of course, these companies are well funded but they are fighting an entity that has unlimited debt levels it can draw upon.

Will Zuckerberg and Dorsey end up broke? Not likely. However, as the likes of Standard Oil and Ma Bell found out, no matter how big one is, the USG is bigger.

Is the Beltway crowd scared of the power threat that Big Tech wields? It is likely the case. Our present government system is not suited to operate in this era of digitization. They are going to do all they can to hold onto power as the next couple decades work against them.

People like Zuckerberg and Dorsey were able to take advantage of the switch into the digital world. This is not going to sit well with the government since that is the true threat to its existence.

We can expect a lot of grandstanding by the establishment and them to make an example out of these different companies.

Let the games begin.


If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and rehive.

gif by @doze

screen_vision2025_1.png

logo by @st8z

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
17 comments
avatar

pixresteemer_incognito_angel_mini.png
Bang, I did it again... I just rehived your post!
Week 65 of my contest just started...you can now check the winners of the previous week!
10

0
0
0.000
avatar

Even when billionaires go broke they don't go broke. We had one of ours declare bankruptcy. 3 days later on the news proposing to his 20 year old wife with a million dollar diamond ring..

Are you using the cent tag? New community, might be worth throwing up on economic type blogs

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ha Ha Ha
That’s a hysterical mockery of bankruptcy laws.
I have never heard of one cent, where can I learn more?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I can see how the government could turn against them. The dems did appear to use big tech last election, but I agree with you it’s a two edge sword, it can help you or hurt you. So it is possible they could now go after them or attempt to “collar the dog” so to speak, so they control it. We will see which strategy they take in the coming months.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't think they will go broke because their connections will never go away. Given how successful they were in the past, I fully expect there a bunch of people who are willing to invest in any project they start afterwards. With that he will have a ton of money to do anything they want.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @taskmaster4450le! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You received more than 22000 HP as payout for your posts and comments.
Your next payout target is 23000 HP.
The unit is Hive Power equivalent because your rewards can be split into HP and HBD
You have been a buzzy bee and published a post every day of the week

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

0
0
0.000
avatar

What I'm truly concerned about is Dorsey's Bluesky project, with power behind tech giants they can unroll their version of account-centered Web 3.0 social media app and steal the show from Hive with far worse product by achieving robust network effect.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Why would they do that? That destroys their existing business model which is still very profitable.

Notice how Bluesky is a lot of talk but no progress is every mentioned.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

On some level they might be aware that their current business model will not be viable any longer, and even if it's still early for Web 3.0, the race has started and even bigger money and power are waiting just around the corner. The position of power gives them advantage, but I hope their power-hunger will blind them.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh no, this is a typical example of never outshine the master here

The tech company might have been able to help the election and help USG in some other ways to bring the government to the position that it is today but clearly they are perceived as threats to the United States Government

Surely the government is going to do all that they can to be able to put them back in their place.

They cannot afford to come out and look like a threat to the USG

They have to be taken out before they change things that were not supposed to change

Also it is true that even if they are not going to lose out in the money aspect, but, having to wake up every morning, and putting their minds inside going to Washington instead of looking for ways to improve their businesses and sniffing out the competition is going to be a really tasking thing to do

I really don't understand what you meant by Trump was outside of Washington can you explain that a bit?


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Never outshine the Master.

This sounds like good advice and a nice metaphor.
I like it.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Smiles....

It's one advice I keep reminding myself of every time

It helps put me on check around people who are supposedly in a higher level than I am

To ensure continuity in our relationship, foster trust, and dependency, I remember those words often

I am glad you like it


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hmm, aren't most politicians on someone's payroll in one form or another, besides the state (even legally where applicable, through contributions to campaigns)?

Although I wouldn't put it past them to bite the hand that feeds them, if it suites them at the time.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

They think they are above the law in many ways and a good slapping would go down very well. I can't stand both companies and deserve whatever is coming their way.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes it's very unlikely they will go broke. Only way they will go broke if they just get on drugs in which they'd probably die taking more drugs than they can handle before they die and still die rich haha. The other option is they just give all their wealth away. The way the structure of the system is rigged it's unlikely they'll go broke from overleveraging. Assuming risk has often times made them richer because it diversified their corporate holdings. So buying everything and everybody it becomes harder to go broke that way.

People like Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey when it comes to the government they are two sides of the same coin. For them to go broke the us government would have to collapse more than likely. Even threats to break up social media doesn't really work because often times people aren't going to go okay i opt to use the second best social media site lol

It just doesn't quite work that way in social media. How people use social media is weird to me. I'd think they'd figure out that hey i'm not going to pay you all for something i contribute to on this scale. We should all own the social media interfaces we use.

They rather keep enriching these particular people or others which is odd but we have to factor that human psychology and behavior doesn't have to follow a logical pattern lol. Which is why we can even end up in situations where the world has mark zuckerbergs and jack dorseys which i feel especially in their sector they shouldn't exist. However they still do.

So i don't think its a question so much of can they go broke. I think it's more of a question of why do we keep enriching them. Why are we so determined to make sure these people control over half of all the resources. Then we double down and come to crypto and do the same thing because its not enough for us that they already control everything in the standard economy. We're now hell bent on making sure they do that in here as well lol.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000