Movers & Shakers of the LEO top 100 - Week 8 - 2021
This is a snapshot of what has happened among the top 100 on the LEO richlist during last week.
Picture by Arthur Halucha on Pixabay
Explanation
Disclaimer
The list is based on accounts with staked LEO.
Accounts with only liquid LEO is excluded.
The liquid and staked LEO is added up and makes an accounts total, that is used in calculation.
If an account ends up at the same % as number 10 on the shakers list it will also be mentioned with a limit of up to 5 accounts.
I am listing the 3 accounts that is just outside the top 100, to maybe inspire them to make that little extra push to get inside.
Removal of accounts
If anyone sees an account in the post that should be removed then please leave a comment telling which account and why. This account will then be removed in any future post if the given reason is acceptable.
About this weeks lists
There has been quite a lot of movement this week, so much so that I decided to expand the movers from 3 to 10 this week.
This will not be permanent.
The 5 first shakers are above 40% which is quite good.
Data
The total of the top 100 accounts has increased with 127707.772 LEO since last week.
To enter the top 100 you have to have more than 7848.084 LEO as of this week.
That is 351.462 LEO more than last week.
The Lists
The biggest Movers are:
Account | # places | from - to | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | @resiliencia.leo | 27 | 81 - 54 |
2 | @stayoutoftherz | 25 | 70 - 45 |
3 | @jk6276 | 24 | 90 - 66 |
4 | @crimsonclad | 15 | 32 - 17 |
4 | @purefood | 15 | 34 - 19 |
4 | @tonimontana.leo | 15 | 77 - 62 |
5 | @abh12345 | 9 | 92 - 83 |
6 | @hykss | 8 | 84 - 76 |
7 | @shaka | 6 | 67 - 61 |
7 | @gualteramarelo | 6 | 79 - 73 |
8 | @shortsegments | 5 | 54 - 49 |
9 | @leovoter | 4 | 47 - 43 |
10 | @jphamer1 | 2 | 59 - 57 |
10 | @michealb | 2 | 97 - 95 |
The biggest Shakers are:
Account | % Gain | |
---|---|---|
1 | @stayoutoftherz | 56% |
2 | @purefood | 55% |
3 | @resiliencia.leo | 55% |
4 | @crimsonclad | 54% |
5 | @jk6276 | 42% |
6 | @tonimontana.leo | 29% |
7 | @abh12345 | 24% |
8 | @shaka | 21% |
9 | @hykss | 20% |
10 | @onealfa | 18% |
HM1 | @gualteramarelo | 18% |
New or returning are:
Position | Account |
---|---|
72 | @steem-eng |
98 | @brofundholdings |
100 | @solarpowers |
Almost there:
Position | Account |
---|---|
101 | @mindtrap-leo |
102 | @summertooth |
103 | @he-index |
Check them out, and follow those you are not following yet.
PS: 10% of the LEO, CTP & HBD from this post goes to @CTPSB.
How did you calculate and what was the time cutoff? Maybe there is a mistake. I don´t have the feeling, that I moved or shaked that much.
I take a snapshot of the richlist once a week. I try to stay to the same day but the time varies some.
Last week you were at 11408 LEO and this week you are at 20333 LEO this is what the calculations are based upon.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
But I have less than 12000 LEO in total. The WLEO in liqidity pool doesn´t count, right? So there must be a flaw. Which richlist you took? This one from Hive-Engine? https://he.dtools.dev/richlist/LEO
I am using the Leodex richlist.
https://leodex.io/richlist/LEO
It reports 382.527 balance and 19950 staked.
Looking at it closer I can see that the Hive-Engine one corresponds with your wallet, so I don't know what is going on with the leodex.
Yes, there is a bug on the Leodex one. I just recently powered-down LEO for the Binance LP and the Leodex richlist apparently can´t calculate this correctly. In fact I have 11400 staked, plus a quarter is in PD and seems Leodex had added the remaining 3/4 to the total sum.
This is really bad if there is a bug in the richlist.
This might make me have to use the hive engine richlist going forward.
I really thought that the leodex richlist had everything in working order especially when it came to their own token.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta