RE: Voting for "Help a CUB ! is open - Please vote and share this post!!

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

I read the posts and was about to vote.
Then I read @erikah's comment and I agree with her
If all the requirements have not been met it is better to postpone to:

  • wait for participants who meet all the requirements
  • or change the requirements if there are no participants because in this case some people may not have participated in the initiative because they did not meet the requirements and in that case they should also have the opportunity to participate.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

leo leofinance hive-167922
0
0
0.000
9 comments
avatar

or change the requirements if there are no participants because in this case some people may not have participated in the initiative because they did not meet the requirements and in that case they should also have the opportunity to participate.

I am not supporting that idea. The requirements were clear and are what they are for a good reason.

We can do another one and select new candidates who meet the requirements.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I also prefer the first option: only participants who meet the requirements.
but if there are no participants then the second option might be applicable: to broaden the requirements...
In this case, however, previous activity within Leofinance should be an important requirement otherwise the computer could go to those who will not publish on Leofinance.
!BEER

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

This is an excellent point from the beginning I have said that the numbers speak more than a thousand words and all the pertinent information can be found on the blockchain. very successful and thanks for bringing it up!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I mostly agree with this. But the change should be for the next contest.

I'm withholding my vote on this one :).

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply