RE: Compare Numbers Hive/CUB/LEO
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Interesting set of comparisons. I almost NEVER upvote posts making comparisons between crypto valuations because they always just talk about token price, which is completely meaningless if you don't take into consideration the circulating supply.
I like the fact that you look not only at supply but also market cap.
I also like the fact that you point out the fact that all of this is "useless data".
Knowing that it's useless data actually makes it useful -- now theres a paradox for ya (maybe I should write about that in @calumam's POB Word of the Week contest).
0
0
0.000
I'm going to have to take a stab at your proposal on the WOTW post because nobody else has taken the plunge. Great idea though, interesting read for sure.
Go for it! Looking forward to hearing what you come up with.
Thanks.
To compare Resource credits + price + users is also interesting. I have the opinion RCs should also scale or like a bitcoin halving event, increase.
We all know with higher computing power for lower cost, Hive could also increase Rcs and lower costs for comments and so on. it would be easy to get done. But it shouldn't be random.
Blocktrades told me as an answer to a comment, Blocksize can be easily increased by a factor of 20 without any bigger problems. Even 100x would be doable the next time with development and cheaper computing power.
This would also mean 1 Hive would become 20 times more powerful.
With this in mind, scaling is no issue, the way the increases would be integrated would be the only problem I see. It shouldn't be random. Is bad for investors and users :)