RE: From a Layman's View Part II
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I don't know about other blockchain projects, but they can't be sparse in population.
Ive been actually looking at those numbers and other blockchains dont really have a fraction of the users Steem has. Crypto is so small that a project like Steem that has about 10k active users is extremely large.
ETC has only about 300 users based on their own stats. Ziliqa has no users, BTCG, BSV..... EOS second biggest dapp fakes more then 90% of its transactions. TRX same thing.
What youre seeing on Twitter about XRP are mostly bots (people actually did the research) and its basically the only place XRP holders gather. Twitter for those holders is like STEEM for Steemians.
The whole crypto ecosystem doesnt have even close to a million unique users let alone a single cryptocurrency
So, you are telling me other projects got more done for less.
That’s Steem for ya. Can’t even mobilise that human capital.
Steem has a 40 million MC. Those others have from 10-100 times the MC and not a single one of those platforms ever had a top 800 website in the world.
That happened when Steem only had a 1billion MC during ATH.
So not really. Those other projects have 0 potential for adoption no matter their MC while Steem has proven it has massive adoption potential at a fraction of the MC but lacks marketing and investment.
Heh, not when it’s perceived as another province in EOSland as Vitalik categorised it.
We shall see what the future holds.
Vitalik dislikes Dan and knows basically nothing about STEEM. They constantly FUD each others projects. Its to be expected.
EOSland? I mean Steem has nothing to do with EOS. Shows that he knows very little about STEEM.
Its a strange phenomena. In legacy market if someone said something like that you would have people correct him but here people just throw around claims regardless of their validity.
Not just him though. Pretty sure the Magical Crypto Friends don’t have high opinions either. Whale Panda pretty much said Steem is a scam to allow the “founders” to make more BTC.
In contrast, Hoskinson had a more objective view of Steem by saying that it’s missing the “hooks” to keep people stay and engaged.