RE: A call...especially to the big stakeholders who have voted the return proposal...
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I think we need better, more compelling proposals.
Right now (I guess things have shifted a bit since your post) the keychain development and consensus proposal to reduce power down time to 4 weeks (which has no budget cost attached to it) are both sitting above return.
In the past we have seen a lot of very questionable or poor proposals. Those are supposed to be below return.
I personally share your view that the documentation proposal is a good one, but ultimately it is up to the voters and voters are less convinced by that one than the others.
As far as I can tell the system is working, but proposers need to up their game. I shouldn't have to remind anyone that Steem is suffering from some very hard times economically. More funds flowing out and potentially getting sold on the market is not cost-free. Proposals to spend money need to be compelling.
I agree 100%
I was talking with a dev in a discord channel yesterday. He was searching some data that he couldn’t find and was wondering how Inertia’s proposal isn’t on top spot. How is it possible that people don’t understand the significance of this proposal...
As for the stepping up their game part. Also agree. That’s why I had voted the return proposal as well. One could submit a proposal asking funds to fix their car or even go on holiday. And with the necessary support...they may even get that...
Return proposal needs to be as high as possible. I have faith in the community that when a proposal that benefits the whole ecosystem pops up, they will support it without second thoughts